Letter to the editor of Heliyon re: Grassmann, G. „New considerations on the validity of the Wiener-Granger causality test” [Heliyon 6 (2020) e05208]

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985807%3A_____%2F21%3A00548093" target="_blank" >RIV/67985807:_____/21:00548093 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07948" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07948</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07948" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07948</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Letter to the editor of Heliyon re: Grassmann, G. „New considerations on the validity of the Wiener-Granger causality test” [Heliyon 6 (2020) e05208]

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Dear Editor, a recently published article questions the Wiener-Granger causality test, more commonly referred to as the Granger causality test. Although the abstract of the paper states that the results were obtained by mathematical tools such as the Fourier transform and differential calculus, the presented serious claim that „...not even the most basic requirement underlying any possible definition of causality is met by the Granger causality test...” is in fact based on a questionable numerical testing of two filtered neural signals (A and B). We will show that the validity of the presented considerations is unfounded for several reasons.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Letter to the editor of Heliyon re: Grassmann, G. „New considerations on the validity of the Wiener-Granger causality test” [Heliyon 6 (2020) e05208]

Popis výsledku anglicky

Dear Editor, a recently published article questions the Wiener-Granger causality test, more commonly referred to as the Granger causality test. Although the abstract of the paper states that the results were obtained by mathematical tools such as the Fourier transform and differential calculus, the presented serious claim that „...not even the most basic requirement underlying any possible definition of causality is met by the Granger causality test...” is in fact based on a questionable numerical testing of two filtered neural signals (A and B). We will show that the validity of the presented considerations is unfounded for several reasons.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10102 - Applied mathematics

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Heliyon

ISSN

2405-8440

e-ISSN

2405-8440

Svazek periodika

7

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

9

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

3

Strana od-do

e07948

Kód UT WoS článku

000705602200047

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85120848807