Unbiased estimation of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) chloroplast structure: Heterogeneity within needle mesophyll under different irradiance and [CO 2 ]
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985823%3A_____%2F19%3A00504785" target="_blank" >RIV/67985823:_____/19:00504785 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11310/19:10394057
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.ias-iss.org/ojs/IAS/article/view/2005" target="_blank" >https://www.ias-iss.org/ojs/IAS/article/view/2005</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5566/ias.2005" target="_blank" >10.5566/ias.2005</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Unbiased estimation of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) chloroplast structure: Heterogeneity within needle mesophyll under different irradiance and [CO 2 ]
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The main objective of this study was to find out whether the selected chloroplast characteristics measured in the mesophyll layer nearest to the needle surface (i.e., the first mesophyll layer) could be representative for the whole needle cross section. Two chloroplast sampling approaches were applied on Norway spruce needles during the investigation of the effects of different levels of air CO2 concentration and irradiance: (i) sampling only from the first mesophyll layer, and (ii) systematic uniform random (SUR) sampling. The selected characteristics were: (i) chloroplast area, (ii) starch grain area, and (iii) starch areal density on median chloroplast cross sections, and (iv) chloroplast number per unit of needle volume. It was shown that the first mesophyll layer was not representative for estimating all evaluated characteristics except the chloroplast area. Sampling only there caused obtaining slightly biased results, while SUR sampling gave unbiased estimations at the cost of longer measuring time. The major effect of studied factors was in starch areal density and starch grain area, which were larger in sun needles in elevated CO2 concentration in comparison with sun needles in ambient CO2 concentration. In conclusion, it was demonstrated that the first layer of mesophyll is not always representative for the needle cross section. If technically feasible, SUR is recommended for analysis of chloroplast ultrastructure. The simplified sampling design can be applied, e.g., for comparisons of many different treatments. However, it should be combined with other approaches to characterize the chloroplast function and the results carefully considered and interpreted.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Unbiased estimation of Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.) chloroplast structure: Heterogeneity within needle mesophyll under different irradiance and [CO 2 ]
Popis výsledku anglicky
The main objective of this study was to find out whether the selected chloroplast characteristics measured in the mesophyll layer nearest to the needle surface (i.e., the first mesophyll layer) could be representative for the whole needle cross section. Two chloroplast sampling approaches were applied on Norway spruce needles during the investigation of the effects of different levels of air CO2 concentration and irradiance: (i) sampling only from the first mesophyll layer, and (ii) systematic uniform random (SUR) sampling. The selected characteristics were: (i) chloroplast area, (ii) starch grain area, and (iii) starch areal density on median chloroplast cross sections, and (iv) chloroplast number per unit of needle volume. It was shown that the first mesophyll layer was not representative for estimating all evaluated characteristics except the chloroplast area. Sampling only there caused obtaining slightly biased results, while SUR sampling gave unbiased estimations at the cost of longer measuring time. The major effect of studied factors was in starch areal density and starch grain area, which were larger in sun needles in elevated CO2 concentration in comparison with sun needles in ambient CO2 concentration. In conclusion, it was demonstrated that the first layer of mesophyll is not always representative for the needle cross section. If technically feasible, SUR is recommended for analysis of chloroplast ultrastructure. The simplified sampling design can be applied, e.g., for comparisons of many different treatments. However, it should be combined with other approaches to characterize the chloroplast function and the results carefully considered and interpreted.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
40102 - Forestry
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
Výsledek vznikl pri realizaci vícero projektů. Více informací v záložce Projekty.
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2019
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Image Analysis and Stereology
ISSN
1580-3139
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
38
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
1
Stát vydavatele periodika
SI - Slovinská republika
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
83-94
Kód UT WoS článku
000464195100009
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85065480947