Qualitative properties of different numerical methods for the inhomogeneous geometric Brownian motion

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985823%3A_____%2F22%3A00557426" target="_blank" >RIV/67985823:_____/22:00557426 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2021.113951" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2021.113951</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2021.113951" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.cam.2021.113951</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Qualitative properties of different numerical methods for the inhomogeneous geometric Brownian motion

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

We provide a comparative analysis of qualitative features of different numerical methods for the inhomogeneous geometric Brownian motion (IGBM). The limit distribution of the IGBM exists, its conditional and asymptotic mean and variance are known and the process can be characterised according to Feller's boundary classification. We compare the frequently used Euler-Maruyama and Milstein methods, two Lie-Trotter and two Strang splitting schemes and two methods based on the ordinary differential equation (ODE) approach, namely the classical Wong-Zakai approximation and the recently proposed log-ODE scheme. First, we prove that, in contrast to the Euler-Maruyama and Milstein schemes, the splitting and ODE schemes preserve the boundary properties of the process, independently of the choice of the time discretisation step. Second, we prove that the limit distribution of the splitting and ODE methods exists for all stepsize values and parameters. Third, we derive closed-form expressions for the conditional and asymptotic means and variances of all considered schemes and analyse the resulting biases. While the Euler-Maruyama and Milstein schemes are the only methods which may have an asymptotically unbiased mean, the splitting and ODE schemes perform better in terms of variance preservation. The Strang schemes outperform the Lie-Trotter splittings, and the log-ODE scheme the classical ODE method. The mean and variance biases of the log-ODE scheme are very small for many relevant parameter settings. However, in some situations the two derived Strang splittings may be a better alternative, one of them requiring considerably less computational effort than the log-ODE method. The proposed analysis may be carried out in a similar fashion on other numerical methods and stochastic differential equations with comparable features.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Qualitative properties of different numerical methods for the inhomogeneous geometric Brownian motion

Popis výsledku anglicky

We provide a comparative analysis of qualitative features of different numerical methods for the inhomogeneous geometric Brownian motion (IGBM). The limit distribution of the IGBM exists, its conditional and asymptotic mean and variance are known and the process can be characterised according to Feller's boundary classification. We compare the frequently used Euler-Maruyama and Milstein methods, two Lie-Trotter and two Strang splitting schemes and two methods based on the ordinary differential equation (ODE) approach, namely the classical Wong-Zakai approximation and the recently proposed log-ODE scheme. First, we prove that, in contrast to the Euler-Maruyama and Milstein schemes, the splitting and ODE schemes preserve the boundary properties of the process, independently of the choice of the time discretisation step. Second, we prove that the limit distribution of the splitting and ODE methods exists for all stepsize values and parameters. Third, we derive closed-form expressions for the conditional and asymptotic means and variances of all considered schemes and analyse the resulting biases. While the Euler-Maruyama and Milstein schemes are the only methods which may have an asymptotically unbiased mean, the splitting and ODE schemes perform better in terms of variance preservation. The Strang schemes outperform the Lie-Trotter splittings, and the log-ODE scheme the classical ODE method. The mean and variance biases of the log-ODE scheme are very small for many relevant parameter settings. However, in some situations the two derived Strang splittings may be a better alternative, one of them requiring considerably less computational effort than the log-ODE method. The proposed analysis may be carried out in a similar fashion on other numerical methods and stochastic differential equations with comparable features.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

10103 - Statistics and probability

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GF20-21030L" target="_blank" >GF20-21030L: Stochastické modely a postupy pro studium olfakce</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics

ISSN

0377-0427

e-ISSN

1879-1778

Svazek periodika

406

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

May 1

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

29

Strana od-do

113951

Kód UT WoS článku

000789740200019

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85121879507