Equilibrium problems and limit analysis of masonry beams

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985840%3A_____%2F12%3A00374067" target="_blank" >RIV/67985840:_____/12:00374067 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10659-011-9318-5" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10659-011-9318-5</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10659-011-9318-5" target="_blank" >10.1007/s10659-011-9318-5</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Equilibrium problems and limit analysis of masonry beams

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

We consider planar straight and curved masonry beams with the constitutive equation from Orlandi (Ph.D. thesis, 1999) and Zani (Eur. J. Mech. A, Solids 23:467-484, 2004). After stating some results about the solution to the boundary value problem, the limit analysis for this kind of bodies is outlined, based on energetic considerations (Lucchesi et al. in Q. Appl. Math. 68:713-746, 2010). The static and kinematic theorems of limit analysis, which usually are justified in a heuristic way (Heyman in The Masonry Arch, 1982; Kooharian in Proc. - Am. Concr. Inst. 89:317-328, 1953), are examined from this point of view. It is seen that the kinematic theorem does not always hold but can be proved under some hypotheses that are frequently met in applications.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Equilibrium problems and limit analysis of masonry beams

Popis výsledku anglicky

We consider planar straight and curved masonry beams with the constitutive equation from Orlandi (Ph.D. thesis, 1999) and Zani (Eur. J. Mech. A, Solids 23:467-484, 2004). After stating some results about the solution to the boundary value problem, the limit analysis for this kind of bodies is outlined, based on energetic considerations (Lucchesi et al. in Q. Appl. Math. 68:713-746, 2010). The static and kinematic theorems of limit analysis, which usually are justified in a heuristic way (Heyman in The Masonry Arch, 1982; Kooharian in Proc. - Am. Concr. Inst. 89:317-328, 1953), are examined from this point of view. It is seen that the kinematic theorem does not always hold but can be proved under some hypotheses that are frequently met in applications.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

BA - Obecná matematika

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2012

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Elasticity

ISSN

0374-3535

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

106

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

24

Strana od-do

165-188

Kód UT WoS článku

000297788200005

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—