Srovnání metod pro měření hmotnostní koncentrace atmosférických aerosolů během kampaně INTERCOMP2000 ? vliv instrumentace a velikosti mezního průměru

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985858%3A_____%2F04%3A00104985" target="_blank" >RIV/67985858:_____/04:00104985 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Intercomparison of Methods to Measure the Mass Concentration of the Atmospheric Aerosol during INTERCOMP2000-Influence of Instrumentation and Size Cuts

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Within the EUROTRAC-2 subproject AEROSOL, the intensive field campaign INTERCOMP2000 was conducted to compare aerosol samplers and methods to measure various aerosol properties. Here a comparison of mass concentrations measured with different PM2.5 and PM10 samplers as well as cascade impactors is described. Different filter types were used. In general, the PM2.5 and PM10 mass concentrations obtained on filters agree well. The data agree within 18.1% (PM2.5, all data). If data obtained with the TEOM (18% low) and on Whatman QM-A quartz fibre filters (low face velocity, 38% high) are excluded, PM2.5 data agree within 8.1%. For PM10, the agreement is within 6.6% (again excluding the Whatman QM-A quartz fibre filters, 22% high) or 12.1% (all data). For the impactor samples, the data agreed within 6.3% (excluding the ELPI, which was 92% high) and 8.7% for PM2.5 and PM10.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Intercomparison of Methods to Measure the Mass Concentration of the Atmospheric Aerosol during INTERCOMP2000-Influence of Instrumentation and Size Cuts

Popis výsledku anglicky

Within the EUROTRAC-2 subproject AEROSOL, the intensive field campaign INTERCOMP2000 was conducted to compare aerosol samplers and methods to measure various aerosol properties. Here a comparison of mass concentrations measured with different PM2.5 and PM10 samplers as well as cascade impactors is described. Different filter types were used. In general, the PM2.5 and PM10 mass concentrations obtained on filters agree well. The data agree within 18.1% (PM2.5, all data). If data obtained with the TEOM (18% low) and on Whatman QM-A quartz fibre filters (low face velocity, 38% high) are excluded, PM2.5 data agree within 8.1%. For PM10, the agreement is within 6.6% (again excluding the Whatman QM-A quartz fibre filters, 22% high) or 12.1% (all data). For the impactor samples, the data agreed within 6.3% (excluding the ELPI, which was 92% high) and 8.7% for PM2.5 and PM10.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

CF - Fyzikální chemie a teoretická chemie

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)

Rok uplatnění

2004

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Atmospheric Environment

ISSN

1352-2310

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

38

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

38

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

10

Strana od-do

6467-6476

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—