Green–Kubo expressions for transport coefficients from dissipative particle dynamics simulations revisited
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985858%3A_____%2F24%3A00580367" target="_blank" >RIV/67985858:_____/24:00580367 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/44555601:13440/24:43898017
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://hdl.handle.net/11104/0349155" target="_blank" >https://hdl.handle.net/11104/0349155</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/d3cp03791f" target="_blank" >10.1039/d3cp03791f</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Green–Kubo expressions for transport coefficients from dissipative particle dynamics simulations revisited
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This article addresses the debate about the correct application of Green–Kubo expressions for transport coefficients from dissipative particle dynamics simulations. We demonstrate that the Green–Kubo expressions are valid provided that the dynamic model conserves the physical property, whose transport is studied, and the fluctuations satisfy detailed balance. As a result, the traditional expressions used in molecular dynamics can also be applied to dissipative particle dynamics simulations. However, taking the calculation of the shear viscosity as a paradigmatic example, a random contribution, whose strength scales as 1/dt 1/2, with dt the time-step, can cause difficulties if the stress tensor is not separated into the different contributions. We compare our expression to that of Ernst and Brito (M. H. Ernst and R. Brito, Europhys. Lett., 2006, 73, 183–189), which arises from a diametrically different perspective. We demonstrate that the two expressions are completely equivalent and find exactly the same result both analytically and numerically. We show that the differences are not due to the lack of time-reversibility but instead from a preaveraging of the random contributions. Despite the overall validity of Green–Kubo expressions, we find that the Einstein–Helfand relations (D. C. Malaspina et al. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2023, 25, 12025–12040) do not suffer from the need to decompose the stress tensor and can readily be used with a high degree of accuracy. Consequently, Einstein–Helfand relations should be seen as the preferred method to calculate transport coefficients from dissipative particle dynamics simulations.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Green–Kubo expressions for transport coefficients from dissipative particle dynamics simulations revisited
Popis výsledku anglicky
This article addresses the debate about the correct application of Green–Kubo expressions for transport coefficients from dissipative particle dynamics simulations. We demonstrate that the Green–Kubo expressions are valid provided that the dynamic model conserves the physical property, whose transport is studied, and the fluctuations satisfy detailed balance. As a result, the traditional expressions used in molecular dynamics can also be applied to dissipative particle dynamics simulations. However, taking the calculation of the shear viscosity as a paradigmatic example, a random contribution, whose strength scales as 1/dt 1/2, with dt the time-step, can cause difficulties if the stress tensor is not separated into the different contributions. We compare our expression to that of Ernst and Brito (M. H. Ernst and R. Brito, Europhys. Lett., 2006, 73, 183–189), which arises from a diametrically different perspective. We demonstrate that the two expressions are completely equivalent and find exactly the same result both analytically and numerically. We show that the differences are not due to the lack of time-reversibility but instead from a preaveraging of the random contributions. Despite the overall validity of Green–Kubo expressions, we find that the Einstein–Helfand relations (D. C. Malaspina et al. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2023, 25, 12025–12040) do not suffer from the need to decompose the stress tensor and can readily be used with a high degree of accuracy. Consequently, Einstein–Helfand relations should be seen as the preferred method to calculate transport coefficients from dissipative particle dynamics simulations.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10403 - Physical chemistry
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics
ISSN
1463-9076
e-ISSN
1463-9084
Svazek periodika
26
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
2
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
12
Strana od-do
1328-1339
Kód UT WoS článku
001129299200001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85180093779