Rock Mass Characterization and Rockfall Monitoring: Traditional Approaches
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985891%3A_____%2F23%3A00577447" target="_blank" >RIV/67985891:_____/23:00577447 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216208:11310/23:10458170
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23859-8_2" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23859-8_2</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23859-8_2" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-031-23859-8_2</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Rock Mass Characterization and Rockfall Monitoring: Traditional Approaches
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Rock mass characterization and rockfall/rock slope stability monitoring methods are one of the fastest evolving research areas in the field of geosciences. Traditionally, simple mapping, geodetical or geotechnical methods are used. The ongoing rapid development of monitoring methods is conditioned by engineering challenges when new infrastructure is nowadays being constructed in complicated geological conditions. These are represented by mountainous areas, deep gorges with steep slopes, or even active landslide sites. Traditional methods can be used within these monitoring demanding sites and bring high-quality monitoring results, sometimes with higher precision than modern state-of-art methods. This chapter reviews traditional rock slope stability monitoring methods and discusses their advantages, applicability, and strong/weak sides. Traditional methods are compared against newly introduced, modern state-of-art methods.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Rock Mass Characterization and Rockfall Monitoring: Traditional Approaches
Popis výsledku anglicky
Rock mass characterization and rockfall/rock slope stability monitoring methods are one of the fastest evolving research areas in the field of geosciences. Traditionally, simple mapping, geodetical or geotechnical methods are used. The ongoing rapid development of monitoring methods is conditioned by engineering challenges when new infrastructure is nowadays being constructed in complicated geological conditions. These are represented by mountainous areas, deep gorges with steep slopes, or even active landslide sites. Traditional methods can be used within these monitoring demanding sites and bring high-quality monitoring results, sometimes with higher precision than modern state-of-art methods. This chapter reviews traditional rock slope stability monitoring methods and discusses their advantages, applicability, and strong/weak sides. Traditional methods are compared against newly introduced, modern state-of-art methods.
Klasifikace
Druh
C - Kapitola v odborné knize
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10505 - Geology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/SS02030023" target="_blank" >SS02030023: Horninové prostředí a suroviny</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2023
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název knihy nebo sborníku
Landslides: Detection, Prediction and Monitoring
ISBN
978-3-031-23858-1
Počet stran výsledku
31
Strana od-do
39-69
Počet stran knihy
419
Název nakladatele
Springer Natural AG
Místo vydání
Cham
Kód UT WoS kapitoly
—