Rules and Acts of Considerateness
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F15%3A00452096" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/15:00452096 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2143/EP.22.3.3108214" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.2143/EP.22.3.3108214</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.2143/EP.22.3.3108214" target="_blank" >10.2143/EP.22.3.3108214</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Rules and Acts of Considerateness
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The present article begins with the question as to whether each rule can really be made explicit and whether it is possible to identify the determining rule in any situation with a normative dimension. It focuses on an example of a moral kind (considerate behaviour) from classic literature. It appears that in order to account for this example properly, a distinction of different kinds or regimes of rules needs to be introduced ? those establishing a normative reality and those reflecting critically uponit (typically moral rules). However, the very idea of reflecting upon moral practice in terms of general rules shows itself to be idle, as the critical rules require far-reaching specifications if they are to make sense. Considerate behaviour is then properly accounted for not in terms of rules for actions, but rather as a question of a form of life or a spirit of behaviour manifesting a virtue. However, the proper role and purpose of introducing the critical rules is not to establish a
Název v anglickém jazyce
Rules and Acts of Considerateness
Popis výsledku anglicky
The present article begins with the question as to whether each rule can really be made explicit and whether it is possible to identify the determining rule in any situation with a normative dimension. It focuses on an example of a moral kind (considerate behaviour) from classic literature. It appears that in order to account for this example properly, a distinction of different kinds or regimes of rules needs to be introduced ? those establishing a normative reality and those reflecting critically uponit (typically moral rules). However, the very idea of reflecting upon moral practice in terms of general rules shows itself to be idle, as the critical rules require far-reaching specifications if they are to make sense. Considerate behaviour is then properly accounted for not in terms of rules for actions, but rather as a question of a form of life or a spirit of behaviour manifesting a virtue. However, the proper role and purpose of introducing the critical rules is not to establish a
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
AA - Filosofie a náboženství
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA13-20785S" target="_blank" >GA13-20785S: Povaha normativity – ontologie, sémantika, logika</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2015
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Ethical Perspectives
ISSN
1370-0049
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
22
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
BE - Belgické království
Počet stran výsledku
24
Strana od-do
395-418
Kód UT WoS článku
000366344200003
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-84954238651