Should one be a left or a right Sellarsian? (And is there really such a choice?)

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F16%3A00458725" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/16:00458725 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/meta.12183" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/meta.12183</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/meta.12183" target="_blank" >10.1111/meta.12183</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Should one be a left or a right Sellarsian? (And is there really such a choice?)

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The followers of Wilfrid Sellars are often divided into 'right' and 'left' Sellarsians, according to whether they believe, in Mark Lance s words, that 'linguistic roles constitutive of meaning and captured by dot quoted words are normative all the way down.' The present article anatomizes this division and argues that it is not easy to give it a nontrivial sense. In particular, the article argues that it is not really possible to construe it as a controversy related to ontology, and goes on to argue that it is also not easy to construe it as one concerning the translatability of the normative idiom into the non-normative one. The conclusion is that the only coherent interpretation of this disagreement is as a disagreement about the possibility and desirability of assuming a standpoint 'inside' our linguistic practices.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Should one be a left or a right Sellarsian? (And is there really such a choice?)

Popis výsledku anglicky

The followers of Wilfrid Sellars are often divided into 'right' and 'left' Sellarsians, according to whether they believe, in Mark Lance s words, that 'linguistic roles constitutive of meaning and captured by dot quoted words are normative all the way down.' The present article anatomizes this division and argues that it is not easy to give it a nontrivial sense. In particular, the article argues that it is not really possible to construe it as a controversy related to ontology, and goes on to argue that it is also not easy to construe it as one concerning the translatability of the normative idiom into the non-normative one. The conclusion is that the only coherent interpretation of this disagreement is as a disagreement about the possibility and desirability of assuming a standpoint 'inside' our linguistic practices.

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA13-20785S" target="_blank" >GA13-20785S: Povaha normativity – ontologie, sémantika, logika</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Metaphilosophy

ISSN

0026-1068

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

47

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

251-263

Kód UT WoS článku

000374136900006

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-84964461810