Cajetan of Thiene on the Logic of Paradox

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F16%3A00465294" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/16:00465294 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/studneoar20161313" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/studneoar20161313</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/studneoar20161313" target="_blank" >10.5840/studneoar20161313</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Cajetan of Thiene on the Logic of Paradox

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The Italian logician, natural philosopher, and doctor of medicine Cajetan of Thiene wrote a commentary on William Heytesbury's Regulae solvendi sophismata. Several late fifteenth century reprints sustained its circulation and further influence. Following Heytesbury, Cajetan listed four alternative treatments of paradoxes, where the first three were formulated in general logico-semantic terms and the last one in terms of obligationes. The present analysis reconstructs the first three positions in terms of the theories of logical operators endorsed as part of the solution to paradoxes. This reconstruction uncovers different underlying views of operators, namely context-sensitive (the function of operators is sensitive to contextual factors), value-functional (the function of operators is purely compositional), and supervaluationist (the function of operators saves classical tautologies by disregarding other factors).

Název v anglickém jazyce

Cajetan of Thiene on the Logic of Paradox

Popis výsledku anglicky

The Italian logician, natural philosopher, and doctor of medicine Cajetan of Thiene wrote a commentary on William Heytesbury's Regulae solvendi sophismata. Several late fifteenth century reprints sustained its circulation and further influence. Following Heytesbury, Cajetan listed four alternative treatments of paradoxes, where the first three were formulated in general logico-semantic terms and the last one in terms of obligationes. The present analysis reconstructs the first three positions in terms of the theories of logical operators endorsed as part of the solution to paradoxes. This reconstruction uncovers different underlying views of operators, namely context-sensitive (the function of operators is sensitive to contextual factors), value-functional (the function of operators is purely compositional), and supervaluationist (the function of operators saves classical tautologies by disregarding other factors).

Druh

J_x - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)

CEP obor

AA - Filosofie a náboženství

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GP13-08389P" target="_blank" >GP13-08389P: Sémantické paradoxy mezi první a druhou scholastikou</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2016

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Studia Neoaristotelica

ISSN

1214-8407

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

13

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

25

Strana od-do

71-95

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85015844073