Paul of Venice and Realist Developments of Roger Swyneshed's Treatment of Semantic Paradoxes

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F17%3A00481494" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/17:00481494 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2017.1350344" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2017.1350344</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2017.1350344" target="_blank" >10.1080/01445340.2017.1350344</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Paul of Venice and Realist Developments of Roger Swyneshed's Treatment of Semantic Paradoxes

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In the 1330s Roger Swyneshed formulated a solution to semantic paradoxes based on the distinction between correspondence with reality and self-falsification as truth-making factors. Since Swyneshed states that some valid inferences are not truth-preserving, his view implies the question of the general definition of validity which he does not address explicitly. Logical works attributed to Paul of Venice (1369-1429) contain developments of Swyneshed's contextualist semantics substantially modified by the assumption that sentential meanings are objective propositional entities. The main goals of this paper are to show the correlations between the ontological and logical developments of Swyneshed's semantics in the works of Paul of Venice and to outline a context-sensitive formal semantics that could serve as a model of this family of semantic theories.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Paul of Venice and Realist Developments of Roger Swyneshed's Treatment of Semantic Paradoxes

Popis výsledku anglicky

In the 1330s Roger Swyneshed formulated a solution to semantic paradoxes based on the distinction between correspondence with reality and self-falsification as truth-making factors. Since Swyneshed states that some valid inferences are not truth-preserving, his view implies the question of the general definition of validity which he does not address explicitly. Logical works attributed to Paul of Venice (1369-1429) contain developments of Swyneshed's contextualist semantics substantially modified by the assumption that sentential meanings are objective propositional entities. The main goals of this paper are to show the correlations between the ontological and logical developments of Swyneshed's semantics in the works of Paul of Venice and to outline a context-sensitive formal semantics that could serve as a model of this family of semantic theories.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GP13-08389P" target="_blank" >GP13-08389P: Sémantické paradoxy mezi první a druhou scholastikou</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2017

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

History and Philosophy of Logic

ISSN

0144-5340

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

38

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

4

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

299-315

Kód UT WoS článku

000413765300001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85028564585