David Ebrey: The Unfolding Account of Forms in the Phaedo

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F18%3A00503617" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/18:00503617 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

David Ebrey: The Unfolding Account of Forms in the Phaedo

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Perhaps Plato’s most famous idea is that things like justice, piety, largeness, and equality are what he calls “forms,” which are in some significant way different from sensible things. While this is an important idea for Plato, it is hard to find an account in the dialogues of why he thinks it and how, exactly, they are supposed to be different. In this paper I argue that scholars have not understood Socrates’ account in the Phaedo because this dialogue has an unusual structure: Socrates’ account of the forms unfolds in five stages over the course of the dialogue. In order to fully understand the claims made in the first stage, one must look to the next stage, and so on until the final stage. On my account, Socrates ultimate reason for distinguishing the forms from sensible things have nothing to do with our intuitions about abstract entities nor with the distinction between universal and particular. The ultimate reason why forms cannot be sensible is because forms must do a sort of causal/explanatory work that no sensible thing could do.

Název v anglickém jazyce

David Ebrey: The Unfolding Account of Forms in the Phaedo

Popis výsledku anglicky

Perhaps Plato’s most famous idea is that things like justice, piety, largeness, and equality are what he calls “forms,” which are in some significant way different from sensible things. While this is an important idea for Plato, it is hard to find an account in the dialogues of why he thinks it and how, exactly, they are supposed to be different. In this paper I argue that scholars have not understood Socrates’ account in the Phaedo because this dialogue has an unusual structure: Socrates’ account of the forms unfolds in five stages over the course of the dialogue. In order to fully understand the claims made in the first stage, one must look to the next stage, and so on until the final stage. On my account, Socrates ultimate reason for distinguishing the forms from sensible things have nothing to do with our intuitions about abstract entities nor with the distinction between universal and particular. The ultimate reason why forms cannot be sensible is because forms must do a sort of causal/explanatory work that no sensible thing could do.

Druh

W - Uspořádání workshopu

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Místo konání akce

Prague

Stát konání akce

CZ - Česká republika

Datum zahájení akce

—

Datum ukončení akce

—

Celkový počet účastníků

17

Počet zahraničních účastníků

2

Typ akce podle státní přísl. účastníků

EUR - Evropská akce