Beyond Logical Pluralism and Logical Monism

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F20%3A00524920" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/20:00524920 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-020-00253-2" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s11787-020-00253-2</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11787-020-00253-2" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11787-020-00253-2</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Beyond Logical Pluralism and Logical Monism

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Logical pluralism as a thesis that more than one logic is correct seems very plausible for two basic reasons. First, there are so many logical systems on the market today. And it is unclear how we should decide which of them gets the logical rules right. On the other hand, logical monism as the opposite thesis still seems plausible, as well, because of normativity of logic. An approach which would manage to bring a synthesis of both logical pluralism and logical monism is called for. I review the possible forms of logical pluralism and render them more plausible. I thus arrive at logical dynamism, a synthesis of various pluralisms and monism focused on how logic develops.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Beyond Logical Pluralism and Logical Monism

Popis výsledku anglicky

Logical pluralism as a thesis that more than one logic is correct seems very plausible for two basic reasons. First, there are so many logical systems on the market today. And it is unclear how we should decide which of them gets the logical rules right. On the other hand, logical monism as the opposite thesis still seems plausible, as well, because of normativity of logic. An approach which would manage to bring a synthesis of both logical pluralism and logical monism is called for. I review the possible forms of logical pluralism and render them more plausible. I thus arrive at logical dynamism, a synthesis of various pluralisms and monism focused on how logic develops.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA17-15645S" target="_blank" >GA17-15645S: Logické modely usuzování a argumentace v přirozeném jazyce</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Logica Universalis

ISSN

1661-8297

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

14

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

24

Strana od-do

151-174

Kód UT WoS článku

000532902200001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85084817045