Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

The Complexities of Syntax

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F20%3A00543508" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/20:00543508 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55438-5_2" target="_blank" >http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55438-5_2</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55438-5_2" target="_blank" >10.1007/978-3-030-55438-5_2</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    The Complexities of Syntax

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    The concepts of syntax and semantics have nowadays become commonplace, both in logic and linguistics, moreover, they seem to belong to the cornerstones of their foundations. Yet the two concepts are far from transparent. It is not only that the terms syntax and semantics are used in different ways within logic and within linguistics, even within each of the two enterprises they tend to be ambiguous. At the same time it turned out that a meticulous specification of both of the concepts may be extremely useful: in logic, an advance in their clarification underlay the breakthrough effected by Gödel, while in linguistics it may help us disentangle the discussions about the nature of semantic theories, as they come to the fore for example in the discussions between Chomskyans and their opponents. Intuitively, we may hold that the contrast between syntax and semantics is clear enough (perhaps just a version of the age-old distinction between form and content?), but this intuition is treacherous. In this paper I try to show that the analyses of the concepts as carried out by Carnap and others revealed their unexpected complexities, and that such analyses may help us map the intricacy of this conceptual entanglement. Also I try to show that getting clear on this is not only needed for strengthening the foundations of logic and linguistics, but also for throwing new light on some widely discussed philosophical problems, such as the discussions about computers having “syntax, but no semantics” initiated by Searle.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    The Complexities of Syntax

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    The concepts of syntax and semantics have nowadays become commonplace, both in logic and linguistics, moreover, they seem to belong to the cornerstones of their foundations. Yet the two concepts are far from transparent. It is not only that the terms syntax and semantics are used in different ways within logic and within linguistics, even within each of the two enterprises they tend to be ambiguous. At the same time it turned out that a meticulous specification of both of the concepts may be extremely useful: in logic, an advance in their clarification underlay the breakthrough effected by Gödel, while in linguistics it may help us disentangle the discussions about the nature of semantic theories, as they come to the fore for example in the discussions between Chomskyans and their opponents. Intuitively, we may hold that the contrast between syntax and semantics is clear enough (perhaps just a version of the age-old distinction between form and content?), but this intuition is treacherous. In this paper I try to show that the analyses of the concepts as carried out by Carnap and others revealed their unexpected complexities, and that such analyses may help us map the intricacy of this conceptual entanglement. Also I try to show that getting clear on this is not only needed for strengthening the foundations of logic and linguistics, but also for throwing new light on some widely discussed philosophical problems, such as the discussions about computers having “syntax, but no semantics” initiated by Searle.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    C - Kapitola v odborné knize

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/GA20-18675S" target="_blank" >GA20-18675S: Povaha logických forem a moderní logika</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2020

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název knihy nebo sborníku

    The Philosophy and Science of Language: Interdisciplinary Perspectives

  • ISBN

    978-3-030-55437-8

  • Počet stran výsledku

    30

  • Strana od-do

    13-42

  • Počet stran knihy

    444

  • Název nakladatele

    Palgrave Macmillan

  • Místo vydání

    Cham

  • Kód UT WoS kapitoly