The Argumenta sophistica in the Debate between Jerome of Prague and Blasius Lupus

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F21%3A00544918" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/21:00544918 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1484/M.SA-EB.5.122639" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1484/M.SA-EB.5.122639</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1484/M.SA-EB.5.122639" target="_blank" >10.1484/M.SA-EB.5.122639</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Argumenta sophistica in the Debate between Jerome of Prague and Blasius Lupus

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This study focuses on the genre of sophisms with particular attention to their importance at the Faculty of Arts of the University of Prague and in the debate between Jerome of Prague and Blasius Lupus in 1409. While the first part deals with the context of the debate between the two scholars, the second suggests a new interpretation of the arrangement of the disputation and of the relevant texts. The third part offers a novel doctrinal interpretation of the three sophistical arguments included in the debate, basing on a new reading of the text extant in MS Praha, Knihovna Metropolitní Kapituly, N 12. The primary context of the solution to sophisms is the solution of an ontological question (“Utrum universalia sint ponenda”), rather than a purely logical analysis. The conclusion of those sophistical arguments is the non existence of universals and ideas, not acceptable from Jerome’s point of view. This part of the study reconstructs the basic logical and ontological principles of Jerome’s solution to Blasius’s sophisms. A new critical edition of the relevant segment of the debate is appended to the study.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Argumenta sophistica in the Debate between Jerome of Prague and Blasius Lupus

Popis výsledku anglicky

This study focuses on the genre of sophisms with particular attention to their importance at the Faculty of Arts of the University of Prague and in the debate between Jerome of Prague and Blasius Lupus in 1409. While the first part deals with the context of the debate between the two scholars, the second suggests a new interpretation of the arrangement of the disputation and of the relevant texts. The third part offers a novel doctrinal interpretation of the three sophistical arguments included in the debate, basing on a new reading of the text extant in MS Praha, Knihovna Metropolitní Kapituly, N 12. The primary context of the solution to sophisms is the solution of an ontological question (“Utrum universalia sint ponenda”), rather than a purely logical analysis. The conclusion of those sophistical arguments is the non existence of universals and ideas, not acceptable from Jerome’s point of view. This part of the study reconstructs the basic logical and ontological principles of Jerome’s solution to Blasius’s sophisms. A new critical edition of the relevant segment of the debate is appended to the study.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA19-16793S" target="_blank" >GA19-16793S: Filosofie na pražské univerzitě okolo roku 1409: Kvodlibet Matěje Knína jako křižovatka evropského středověkého vědění</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Studying the Arts in Late Medieval Bohemia: Production, Reception and Transmission of Knowledge

ISBN

978-2-503-59317-3

Počet stran výsledku

29

Strana od-do

205-233

Počet stran knihy

358

Název nakladatele

Brepols

Místo vydání

Turnhout

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—