Hurtado de Mendoza on the “moral” modality. Part 1: Hurtado’s writings prior to 1630

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F21%3A00554855" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/21:00554855 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.5840/studneoar20211813" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.5840/studneoar20211813</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/studneoar20211813" target="_blank" >10.5840/studneoar20211813</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Hurtado de Mendoza on the “moral” modality. Part 1: Hurtado’s writings prior to 1630

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

One of the prominent debates of post-Tridentine scholasticism addressed probability, often expressed by the term “moral” (or adverbially, “morally”), originally motivated by the epistemology of decision-making and the debates on predestination and “middle knowledge”. Puente (or Pedro) Hurtado de Mendoza (1578–1641), an Iberian Jesuit and the author of one of the earliest Jesuit philosophy courses, entered this debate in the early-seventeenth century. This paper presents his 1610s and 1620s analyses of different forms or degrees of evidence, certainty, and necessity or impossibility, addressing the commonly-used trichotomy of the “metaphysical”, “physical”, and “moral”, in which “moral” is the weakest form of a modality, together with the paradigmatic examples and interesting applications of the framework.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Hurtado de Mendoza on the “moral” modality. Part 1: Hurtado’s writings prior to 1630

Popis výsledku anglicky

One of the prominent debates of post-Tridentine scholasticism addressed probability, often expressed by the term “moral” (or adverbially, “morally”), originally motivated by the epistemology of decision-making and the debates on predestination and “middle knowledge”. Puente (or Pedro) Hurtado de Mendoza (1578–1641), an Iberian Jesuit and the author of one of the earliest Jesuit philosophy courses, entered this debate in the early-seventeenth century. This paper presents his 1610s and 1620s analyses of different forms or degrees of evidence, certainty, and necessity or impossibility, addressing the commonly-used trichotomy of the “metaphysical”, “physical”, and “moral”, in which “moral” is the weakest form of a modality, together with the paradigmatic examples and interesting applications of the framework.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA17-12408S" target="_blank" >GA17-12408S: Pravděpodobnostní argumentace v pozdně scholastické logice</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Studia Neoaristotelica

ISSN

1214-8407

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

18

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

29

Strana od-do

65-93

Kód UT WoS článku

000756251000003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85124563629