Logica Dominans vs. Logica Serviens

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F22%3A00558589" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/22:00558589 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2022.004" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2022.004</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2022.004" target="_blank" >10.12775/LLP.2022.004</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Logica Dominans vs. Logica Serviens

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Logic is usually presented as a tool of rational inquiry, however,many logicians in fact treat logic so that it does not serve us, but rathergoverns us  as rational beings we are subordinated to the logical laws weaspire to disclose. We denote the view that logic primarily serves us aslogicaserviens, while denoting the thesis that it primarily governs our reasoningaslogica dominans. We argue that treating logic aslogica dominansismisguided, for it leads to the idea of a “genuine” logic within a “genuine” language. Instead of this, we offer a naturalistic picture, according to whichthe only languages that exist are the natural languages and the artificiallanguages logicians have built. There is, we argue, no language beyondthese, especially none that would be a wholesome vehicle of reasoning likethe natural languages and yet be transparently rigorous like the artificialones. Logic is a matter of using the artificial languages as idealized modelsof the natural ones, whereby we pinpoint the laws of logic by means ofzooming in on a reflective equilibrium.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Logica Dominans vs. Logica Serviens

Popis výsledku anglicky

Logic is usually presented as a tool of rational inquiry, however,many logicians in fact treat logic so that it does not serve us, but rathergoverns us  as rational beings we are subordinated to the logical laws weaspire to disclose. We denote the view that logic primarily serves us aslogicaserviens, while denoting the thesis that it primarily governs our reasoningaslogica dominans. We argue that treating logic aslogica dominansismisguided, for it leads to the idea of a “genuine” logic within a “genuine” language. Instead of this, we offer a naturalistic picture, according to whichthe only languages that exist are the natural languages and the artificiallanguages logicians have built. There is, we argue, no language beyondthese, especially none that would be a wholesome vehicle of reasoning likethe natural languages and yet be transparently rigorous like the artificialones. Logic is a matter of using the artificial languages as idealized modelsof the natural ones, whereby we pinpoint the laws of logic by means ofzooming in on a reflective equilibrium.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA20-18675S" target="_blank" >GA20-18675S: Povaha logických forem a moderní logika</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Logic and Logical Philosophy

ISSN

1425-3305

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

31

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

PL - Polská republika

Počet stran výsledku

25

Strana od-do

183-207

Kód UT WoS článku

000752406300001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85147300764