Franz Brentano on the Errors of Mach’s Positivism. Psychology, Metaphysics, Logic

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F22%3A00565890" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/22:00565890 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110734645-014" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110734645-014</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110734645-014" target="_blank" >10.1515/9783110734645-014</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Franz Brentano on the Errors of Mach’s Positivism. Psychology, Metaphysics, Logic

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

As Brentano was very much concerned with criticizing positivism, he was compelled to pay particular attention to its most updated versions. The works of Ernst Mach were of special interest to him in this respect, for he regarded Mach’s philosophy as positivism in its most advanced form. His criticism of this version of positivism is moreover of great interest to us because Mach is an important link to the logical positivism that came to thrive in Vienna. In lectures, Brentano had argued against Mach’s allegedly anti-metaphysical doctrine of elements, the heart of his positivism, but after his retirement he wrote an extensive critique of Mach’s Erkenntnis und Irrtum (1905), which is the mature statement of the Machian orientation in philosophy. This contribution is an elaboration of Brentano’s critique in three different areas, namely, psychology, metaphysics, and logic.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Franz Brentano on the Errors of Mach’s Positivism. Psychology, Metaphysics, Logic

Popis výsledku anglicky

As Brentano was very much concerned with criticizing positivism, he was compelled to pay particular attention to its most updated versions. The works of Ernst Mach were of special interest to him in this respect, for he regarded Mach’s philosophy as positivism in its most advanced form. His criticism of this version of positivism is moreover of great interest to us because Mach is an important link to the logical positivism that came to thrive in Vienna. In lectures, Brentano had argued against Mach’s allegedly anti-metaphysical doctrine of elements, the heart of his positivism, but after his retirement he wrote an extensive critique of Mach’s Erkenntnis und Irrtum (1905), which is the mature statement of the Machian orientation in philosophy. This contribution is an elaboration of Brentano’s critique in three different areas, namely, psychology, metaphysics, and logic.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60302 - Ethics (except ethics related to specific subfields)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Brentano and the Positive Philosophy of Comte and Mill. With Translations of Original Writings on Philosophy as Science by Franz Brentano

ISBN

978-3-11-073885-8

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

331-349

Počet stran knihy

616

Název nakladatele

De Gruyer

Místo vydání

Berlin

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—