Jan Patočka on Descartes and Husserl’s Cartesianism

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F23%3A00573376" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/23:00573376 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Jan Patočka on Descartes and Husserl’s Cartesianism

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

In the first part of the chapter, we followed how in the 1930s, inspired by Husserl, Patočka makes an effort to deepen the critique of Descartes’ philosophy in its two aspects of method and metaphysics, reducing the rhetorical emphasis present in Husserl. In this light, Descartes appears not so much as a discoverer, but rather as a skillful systematizer providing an adequate methodological basis for the various sciences from physics to medicine and psychology. Second, although Descartes introduced motifs of medieval ontology into his philosophy, he de-problematized and instrumentalized them, thus completing the long process of the transformation of Aristotelian metaphysics. In the second part, we described Patočka’s critique of Husserl’s Cartesianism, a Cartesianism that originally stems from Brentano’s philosophy.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Jan Patočka on Descartes and Husserl’s Cartesianism

Popis výsledku anglicky

In the first part of the chapter, we followed how in the 1930s, inspired by Husserl, Patočka makes an effort to deepen the critique of Descartes’ philosophy in its two aspects of method and metaphysics, reducing the rhetorical emphasis present in Husserl. In this light, Descartes appears not so much as a discoverer, but rather as a skillful systematizer providing an adequate methodological basis for the various sciences from physics to medicine and psychology. Second, although Descartes introduced motifs of medieval ontology into his philosophy, he de-problematized and instrumentalized them, thus completing the long process of the transformation of Aristotelian metaphysics. In the second part, we described Patočka’s critique of Husserl’s Cartesianism, a Cartesianism that originally stems from Brentano’s philosophy.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Edmund Husserl’s Cartesian Meditations

ISBN

978-3-495-99554-9

Počet stran výsledku

24

Strana od-do

329-352

Počet stran knihy

521

Název nakladatele

Karl Alber

Místo vydání

Baden-Baden

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—