Nicholas of Miličín On Human Supposit. Two Versions of a Determination from the 1409 Prague “Quodlibet”

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F22%3A00583359" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/22:00583359 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://hdl.handle.net/2434/953299" target="_blank" >https://hdl.handle.net/2434/953299</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Nicholas of Miličín On Human Supposit. Two Versions of a Determination from the 1409 Prague “Quodlibet”

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

A little-known member of the Bohemian masters’ circle inspired by the philosophical and theological views of John Wyclif, Nicholas of Miličín was affiliated with the Faculty of Arts and active as a preacher in Prague from at least 1390. After outlining his intellectual biography, the article focuses on the determination of a question posed to him by Matthias of Knín at the 1409 Prague Quodlibet. The text is transmitted by two manuscripts, both attributing it to Miličín. A further determinatio of the same question is found in one of the two manuscripts, where it is left unascribed. A comparison of the two texts in terms of textual and doctrinal similarities and differences is provided. This analysis raises some important questions concerning academic practices and intellectual life at Charles University at the turn of the fifteenth century.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Nicholas of Miličín On Human Supposit. Two Versions of a Determination from the 1409 Prague “Quodlibet”

Popis výsledku anglicky

A little-known member of the Bohemian masters’ circle inspired by the philosophical and theological views of John Wyclif, Nicholas of Miličín was affiliated with the Faculty of Arts and active as a preacher in Prague from at least 1390. After outlining his intellectual biography, the article focuses on the determination of a question posed to him by Matthias of Knín at the 1409 Prague Quodlibet. The text is transmitted by two manuscripts, both attributing it to Miličín. A further determinatio of the same question is found in one of the two manuscripts, where it is left unascribed. A comparison of the two texts in terms of textual and doctrinal similarities and differences is provided. This analysis raises some important questions concerning academic practices and intellectual life at Charles University at the turn of the fifteenth century.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA19-16793S" target="_blank" >GA19-16793S: Filosofie na pražské univerzitě okolo roku 1409: Kvodlibet Matěje Knína jako křižovatka evropského středověkého vědění</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Studi sull’Aristotelismo medievale

ISSN

2785-5066

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

2

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

IT - Italská republika

Počet stran výsledku

54

Strana od-do

449-502

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—