The Quest for Meaning. Patočka against Kant

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F23%3A00578149" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/23:00578149 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Quest for Meaning. Patočka against Kant

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The essay explores Patočka’s discussion of the question of meaning, connected with the criticism of Kant’s theory of postulates of pure practical reason, as developed in Patočka’s last finished paper “Around Masaryk’s Philosophy of Religion”. The essence of this criticism is expressed by the words “ontic retribution”, referring to two problems: Kant’s notion of postulates as the final purpose remains on merely ontical level, not being able to reach the ontological sphere that, for Patočka inspired by early Heidegger, stands out for the thinking able to recognize the basic difference between beings and being as such. Second, Kant’s view of postulates of practical reason is strictly bound to the moral view of the world with the give-and-take, “accountancy” reciprocity. Patočka suggests ontological, non-moral and yet somehow “absolute” and unbreakable notion of meaning as a “secret presence of immensurable richness”. Sharpness of Patočka’s arguments against Kant can be dulled by a more careful reading of postulates as non-objectified ideas, as well as by advocating the aspect of reciprocity with reference to the necessity of dialogical autonomy.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Quest for Meaning. Patočka against Kant

Popis výsledku anglicky

The essay explores Patočka’s discussion of the question of meaning, connected with the criticism of Kant’s theory of postulates of pure practical reason, as developed in Patočka’s last finished paper “Around Masaryk’s Philosophy of Religion”. The essence of this criticism is expressed by the words “ontic retribution”, referring to two problems: Kant’s notion of postulates as the final purpose remains on merely ontical level, not being able to reach the ontological sphere that, for Patočka inspired by early Heidegger, stands out for the thinking able to recognize the basic difference between beings and being as such. Second, Kant’s view of postulates of practical reason is strictly bound to the moral view of the world with the give-and-take, “accountancy” reciprocity. Patočka suggests ontological, non-moral and yet somehow “absolute” and unbreakable notion of meaning as a “secret presence of immensurable richness”. Sharpness of Patočka’s arguments against Kant can be dulled by a more careful reading of postulates as non-objectified ideas, as well as by advocating the aspect of reciprocity with reference to the necessity of dialogical autonomy.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Kant and the Phenomenological Tradition. Kant und die phänomenologische Tradition

ISBN

978-3-495-99461-0

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

133-151

Počet stran knihy

185

Název nakladatele

Karl Alber

Místo vydání

Baden-Baden

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—