The Basel Compactata and the Limits of Religious Coexistence in the Age of Conciliarism and Beyond

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F23%3A00579774" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/23:00579774 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S000964072300207X" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1017/S000964072300207X</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000964072300207X" target="_blank" >10.1017/S000964072300207X</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Basel Compactata and the Limits of Religious Coexistence in the Age of Conciliarism and Beyond

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article aims to provide a better understanding of the Basel Compactata by discussing the controversial nature of these documents as demonstrated in international diplomacy and polemical writings of the fifteenth century. It shows that the Compactata could easily have become a crucial bone of contention between Catholics and Bohemian Utraquists, yet the Catholic diplomats’ negative approach toward these documents was evidently not influenced by their origins in the Council of Basel, for other phenomena played a more prominent role. The article also shows that there existed at least three major differences between the standard Catholic and Utraquist interpretation of the key provision of the Compactata, which was possible due to their compromise wording.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Basel Compactata and the Limits of Religious Coexistence in the Age of Conciliarism and Beyond

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article aims to provide a better understanding of the Basel Compactata by discussing the controversial nature of these documents as demonstrated in international diplomacy and polemical writings of the fifteenth century. It shows that the Compactata could easily have become a crucial bone of contention between Catholics and Bohemian Utraquists, yet the Catholic diplomats’ negative approach toward these documents was evidently not influenced by their origins in the Council of Basel, for other phenomena played a more prominent role. The article also shows that there existed at least three major differences between the standard Catholic and Utraquist interpretation of the key provision of the Compactata, which was possible due to their compromise wording.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GX19-28415X" target="_blank" >GX19-28415X: Od performativity k institucionalizaci. Řešení konfliktů v pozdním středověku (strategie, aktéři, komunikace)</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Church History: studies in Christianity and culture

ISSN

0009-6407

e-ISSN

1755-2613

Svazek periodika

92

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

25

Strana od-do

534-558

Kód UT WoS článku

001122842300029

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85180975540