Logic as a Science of Patterns?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F24%3A00580766" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/24:00580766 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil202412111" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil202412111</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/jphil202412111" target="_blank" >10.5840/jphil202412111</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Logic as a Science of Patterns?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

I propose that logic may be seen as a science of patterns-however, not in the sense in which mathematics is a science of patterns, but rather in the sense in which physics is. The proposal is that logic identifies, explores, and fixes the inferential patterns which de facto govern our argumentative practices. It can be seen, I argue, as picking up the patterns and working from them toward the state of reflective equilibrium, where the laws it aims at are explicitly articulated. Due to the normativity of logic, this process is not quite the same as that in which a natural science works its way from data to its laws: however, there is no reason why it should be seen as proceeding via a mysterious “a priori analysis.” Instead, it should proceed in the intersubjective space in which the sciences are practiced.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Logic as a Science of Patterns?

Popis výsledku anglicky

I propose that logic may be seen as a science of patterns-however, not in the sense in which mathematics is a science of patterns, but rather in the sense in which physics is. The proposal is that logic identifies, explores, and fixes the inferential patterns which de facto govern our argumentative practices. It can be seen, I argue, as picking up the patterns and working from them toward the state of reflective equilibrium, where the laws it aims at are explicitly articulated. Due to the normativity of logic, this process is not quite the same as that in which a natural science works its way from data to its laws: however, there is no reason why it should be seen as proceeding via a mysterious “a priori analysis.” Instead, it should proceed in the intersubjective space in which the sciences are practiced.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA20-18675S" target="_blank" >GA20-18675S: Povaha logických forem a moderní logika</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

The Journal of Philosophy

ISSN

0022-362X

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

121

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

US - Spojené státy americké

Počet stran výsledku

21

Strana od-do

5-25

Kód UT WoS článku

001185230100003

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85186557733