The Good and the Wrong of Hypocritical Blaming

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F24%3A00582946" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/24:00582946 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820823000274" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820823000274</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0953820823000274" target="_blank" >10.1017/S0953820823000274</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Good and the Wrong of Hypocritical Blaming

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Provided we blame others accurately, is blaming them morally right even if we are guilty of similar wrongdoing ourselves? On the one hand, hypocrisy seems to render blame morally wrong, and unjustified, but on the other, even hypocritical blaming seems better than silence. I develop an account of the wrongness of hypocritical blaming which resolves this apparent dilemma. When holding others accountable for their moral failings, we ought to be willing to reason, together with them, about our own, similar failings. Hypocrisy undermines this process of mutual deliberation. Thus, even if better than silence, hypocritical blaming is second-best, and that is why it is wrong.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Good and the Wrong of Hypocritical Blaming

Popis výsledku anglicky

Provided we blame others accurately, is blaming them morally right even if we are guilty of similar wrongdoing ourselves? On the one hand, hypocrisy seems to render blame morally wrong, and unjustified, but on the other, even hypocritical blaming seems better than silence. I develop an account of the wrongness of hypocritical blaming which resolves this apparent dilemma. When holding others accountable for their moral failings, we ought to be willing to reason, together with them, about our own, similar failings. Hypocrisy undermines this process of mutual deliberation. Thus, even if better than silence, hypocritical blaming is second-best, and that is why it is wrong.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60302 - Ethics (except ethics related to specific subfields)

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Utilitas

ISSN

0953-8208

e-ISSN

1741-6183

Svazek periodika

36

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

19

Strana od-do

83-101

Kód UT WoS článku

001128713100001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85181020836