Technological Mediation without Empirical Borders

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F24%3A00599647" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/24:00599647 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0421.05" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.11647/obp.0421.05</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/obp.0421.05" target="_blank" >10.11647/obp.0421.05</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Technological Mediation without Empirical Borders

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This chapter argues that postphenomenology suffers from three main shortcomings: (1) it fails to engage with the question what constitutes a technology, (2) it mistakenly reduces technological mediations to observable interactions between humans and technologies, and (3) its commitment to the empirical turn in the philosophy of technology provides limited access to postphenomenology’s self-proclaimed object of study: human-technology relations. In providing these critiques, the chapter offers a substantial general critique of the empirical turn in the philosophy of technology, as well as points towards the need to find a language to articulate how the notion of “technological mediation” is not bounded to particular empirical circumstances.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Technological Mediation without Empirical Borders

Popis výsledku anglicky

This chapter argues that postphenomenology suffers from three main shortcomings: (1) it fails to engage with the question what constitutes a technology, (2) it mistakenly reduces technological mediations to observable interactions between humans and technologies, and (3) its commitment to the empirical turn in the philosophy of technology provides limited access to postphenomenology’s self-proclaimed object of study: human-technology relations. In providing these critiques, the chapter offers a substantial general critique of the empirical turn in the philosophy of technology, as well as points towards the need to find a language to articulate how the notion of “technological mediation” is not bounded to particular empirical circumstances.

Druh

C - Kapitola v odborné knize

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EH22_008%2F0004595" target="_blank" >EH22_008/0004595: Za hranice bezpečnosti: role konfliktu v posilování odolnosti</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název knihy nebo sborníku

Phenomenology and the Philosophy of Technology

ISBN

978-1-80511-380-5

Počet stran výsledku

22

Strana od-do

121-142

Počet stran knihy

292

Název nakladatele

OpenBook Publishers

Místo vydání

Cambridge

Kód UT WoS kapitoly

—