Semi-Anonymous Hate Speech

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F24%3A00599859" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/24:00599859 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Semi-Anonymous Hate Speech

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The presentation dealt with a widespread type of hate speech that has not yet been investigated in the applied philosophy of language focusing on hateful expressions: semi-anonymous hate speech, which includes an irreducible element of anonymity and non-anonymity. Two types of hate speech are typically distinguished - anonymous speech, whose authors are not identifiable as particular individuals, and non-anonymous speech, whose authors are identifiable as such. I explained that such a distinction does not capture utterances whose author is identifiable, yet does not merely use the utterance in question, but also approvingly mentions an indeterminate mass of previously formulated hateful utterances. This introduces a crucial element of anonymity into the originally non-anonymous utterance and allows us to talk about semi-anonymous hate speech. I focused on the following three points: (i) this kind of mention is not just a mention of some other utterance, but of a mass of hateful utterances, (ii) the echo here may be an expression not only of agreement with a proposition, but also with the use of derogatory language and offensive illocution, (iii) semi-anonymous hate speech is an expression of consent to a certain type of authority that may underlie the mass of hateful statements.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Semi-Anonymous Hate Speech

Popis výsledku anglicky

The presentation dealt with a widespread type of hate speech that has not yet been investigated in the applied philosophy of language focusing on hateful expressions: semi-anonymous hate speech, which includes an irreducible element of anonymity and non-anonymity. Two types of hate speech are typically distinguished - anonymous speech, whose authors are not identifiable as particular individuals, and non-anonymous speech, whose authors are identifiable as such. I explained that such a distinction does not capture utterances whose author is identifiable, yet does not merely use the utterance in question, but also approvingly mentions an indeterminate mass of previously formulated hateful utterances. This introduces a crucial element of anonymity into the originally non-anonymous utterance and allows us to talk about semi-anonymous hate speech. I focused on the following three points: (i) this kind of mention is not just a mention of some other utterance, but of a mass of hateful utterances, (ii) the echo here may be an expression not only of agreement with a proposition, but also with the use of derogatory language and offensive illocution, (iii) semi-anonymous hate speech is an expression of consent to a certain type of authority that may underlie the mass of hateful statements.

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/EH22_008%2F0004595" target="_blank" >EH22_008/0004595: Za hranice bezpečnosti: role konfliktu v posilování odolnosti</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů