The Emerging Science of Multisystemic Resilience. Trade-offs and Transformations in Contexts of Adversity

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F24%3A00603898" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/24:00603898 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2024.79.10.8" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2024.79.10.8</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.31577/filozofia.2024.79.10.8" target="_blank" >10.31577/filozofia.2024.79.10.8</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Emerging Science of Multisystemic Resilience. Trade-offs and Transformations in Contexts of Adversity

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper explores the concept of resilience as much more than a personal capacity to overcome adversity. Using reflections from ontology, ethics and epistemology, this paper offers philosophical contextualisation of resilience thinking and the corresponding paradigm shift. It shows that individual resilience depends on a person’s ability to navigate their way to the resources they need for well-being while making multisystemic resources available in ways that are meaningful. Paradoxically, resilience is a consequence of how these multiple systems interact to support positive development and the feedback loops and trade-offs necessary to ensure that a single system’s success does not compromise the resilience of other systems. Five patterns of resilience are discussed, each a viable solution to coping with stress.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Emerging Science of Multisystemic Resilience. Trade-offs and Transformations in Contexts of Adversity

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper explores the concept of resilience as much more than a personal capacity to overcome adversity. Using reflections from ontology, ethics and epistemology, this paper offers philosophical contextualisation of resilience thinking and the corresponding paradigm shift. It shows that individual resilience depends on a person’s ability to navigate their way to the resources they need for well-being while making multisystemic resources available in ways that are meaningful. Paradoxically, resilience is a consequence of how these multiple systems interact to support positive development and the feedback loops and trade-offs necessary to ensure that a single system’s success does not compromise the resilience of other systems. Five patterns of resilience are discussed, each a viable solution to coping with stress.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/LX22NPO5101" target="_blank" >LX22NPO5101: Národní institut pro výzkum socioekonomických dopadů nemocí a systémových rizik</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2024

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Filozofia

ISSN

0046-385X

e-ISSN

2585-7061

Svazek periodika

79

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

10

Stát vydavatele periodika

SK - Slovenská republika

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

1174-1185

Kód UT WoS článku

001378618500007

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85212626230