The Enigma of Normative Attitudes

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985955%3A_____%2F26%3A00640902" target="_blank" >RIV/67985955:_____/26:00640902 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10152-6" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10152-6</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11245-024-10152-6" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11245-024-10152-6</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

The Enigma of Normative Attitudes

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The paper focuses its attention on the opacities and ambiguities that concern the meaning of the term “normative attitude” as it is used in two versions of inferentialism – in Brandom’s foundational inferentialist system and in Peregrin’s naturalized version of inferentialism. It suggests that both authors oscillate between viewing normative attitudes as publically accessible affairs and as private states/events hidden from the sight of others. Given the pivotal role of the term and the fact that the relevant private and public sides are not always in harmony, this is quite problematic. The paper suggests that instead of focusing on normative attitudes inferentialists should consider focusing on corrective (re)actions and on the relationships between people that they establish. Such a move might yield a more robust concept of normativity suitable for the theoretical edifice of naturalized inferentialism.

Název v anglickém jazyce

The Enigma of Normative Attitudes

Popis výsledku anglicky

The paper focuses its attention on the opacities and ambiguities that concern the meaning of the term “normative attitude” as it is used in two versions of inferentialism – in Brandom’s foundational inferentialist system and in Peregrin’s naturalized version of inferentialism. It suggests that both authors oscillate between viewing normative attitudes as publically accessible affairs and as private states/events hidden from the sight of others. Given the pivotal role of the term and the fact that the relevant private and public sides are not always in harmony, this is quite problematic. The paper suggests that instead of focusing on normative attitudes inferentialists should consider focusing on corrective (re)actions and on the relationships between people that they establish. Such a move might yield a more robust concept of normativity suitable for the theoretical edifice of naturalized inferentialism.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60301 - Philosophy, History and Philosophy of science and technology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA23-07119S" target="_blank" >GA23-07119S: VÝZNAM JAKO OBJEKT - PRINCIPY SÉMANTICKÝCH TEORIÍ</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2026

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Topoi: an international review of philosophy

ISSN

0167-7411

e-ISSN

1572-8749

Svazek periodika

45

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

DE - Spolková republika Německo

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

153-163

Kód UT WoS článku

001381633000001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85212838996