Does investor protection increase foreign direct investment? A meta‐analysis

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F67985998%3A_____%2F21%3A00542056" target="_blank" >RIV/67985998:_____/21:00542056 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12392" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12392</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joes.12392" target="_blank" >10.1111/joes.12392</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Does investor protection increase foreign direct investment? A meta‐analysis

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

We undertake a meta-analysis of the effects of international investment agreements for the protection of foreign investors on foreign direct investment using 2107 estimates drawn from 74 studies. Our meta-analysis finds robust evidence that effect of international investment agreements is so small as to be considered zero. However, our results do not rule out the possibility that the effect of these agreements is, in fact, positive and that current research methods are insufficiently powerful or precise to identify the underlying genuine effect. FDI from developed countries appears to be more responsive to the existence of investment protection, and there is evidence of publication–selection bias in favour of studies that find a positive effect for investor protection.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Does investor protection increase foreign direct investment? A meta‐analysis

Popis výsledku anglicky

We undertake a meta-analysis of the effects of international investment agreements for the protection of foreign investors on foreign direct investment using 2107 estimates drawn from 74 studies. Our meta-analysis finds robust evidence that effect of international investment agreements is so small as to be considered zero. However, our results do not rule out the possibility that the effect of these agreements is, in fact, positive and that current research methods are insufficiently powerful or precise to identify the underlying genuine effect. FDI from developed countries appears to be more responsive to the existence of investment protection, and there is evidence of publication–selection bias in favour of studies that find a positive effect for investor protection.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50202 - Applied Economics, Econometrics

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA18-04630S" target="_blank" >GA18-04630S: Ekonomický dopad investičních sporů</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2021

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Journal of Economic Surveys

ISSN

0950-0804

e-ISSN

1467-6419

Svazek periodika

35

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

37

Strana od-do

34-70

Kód UT WoS článku

000573703100001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85091728089