The state of vigilance and not antiseizure medication dosage drive variability in interictal epilepsy biomarkers
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081731%3A_____%2F25%3A00638567" target="_blank" >RIV/68081731:_____/25:00638567 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00159816:_____/25:00082392 RIV/00216224:14110/25:00141884 RIV/00216305:26220/26:0199134
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245725006777" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245725006777</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110825" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110825</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
The state of vigilance and not antiseizure medication dosage drive variability in interictal epilepsy biomarkers
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Objective: During presurgical intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) investigation, anti-seizure medication (ASM) is typically tapered to record seizures. Interictal biomarkers are critical for epileptogenic zone (EZ) localization. This study examines how ASM tapering and other confounding factors influence the rates and localization accuracy of interictal iEEG biomarkers. Methods: iEEG data from 19 patients were analyzed during two 24 h sections separated by at least seven days during > 10-day iEEG monitoring. ASM dosage, vigilance state, time of day, seizure proximity, and duration of monitoring were evaluated for their impact on interictal biomarker rates, spatial distribution and localization of the EZ. Results: Biomarker rates, spatial distributions, and EZ localization did not significantly differ between the two 24hour sections. The state of vigilance emerged as the most significant contributor explaining 22.7 % of the variability. Seizure proximity, time of day and ASM dosage contributed minimally, each accounting for <= 3.7 % of the variability. Conclusions: The state of vigilance is the most significant determinant of interictal biomarker variability, and exceeds the impact of all other confounding factors regarding biomarker rates, distribution, and EZ localization. Significance: These findings highlight the importance of vigilance state over ASM tapering, supporting the potential use of interictal biomarkers for EZ localization, regardless of ASM adjustments.
Název v anglickém jazyce
The state of vigilance and not antiseizure medication dosage drive variability in interictal epilepsy biomarkers
Popis výsledku anglicky
Objective: During presurgical intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) investigation, anti-seizure medication (ASM) is typically tapered to record seizures. Interictal biomarkers are critical for epileptogenic zone (EZ) localization. This study examines how ASM tapering and other confounding factors influence the rates and localization accuracy of interictal iEEG biomarkers. Methods: iEEG data from 19 patients were analyzed during two 24 h sections separated by at least seven days during > 10-day iEEG monitoring. ASM dosage, vigilance state, time of day, seizure proximity, and duration of monitoring were evaluated for their impact on interictal biomarker rates, spatial distribution and localization of the EZ. Results: Biomarker rates, spatial distributions, and EZ localization did not significantly differ between the two 24hour sections. The state of vigilance emerged as the most significant contributor explaining 22.7 % of the variability. Seizure proximity, time of day and ASM dosage contributed minimally, each accounting for <= 3.7 % of the variability. Conclusions: The state of vigilance is the most significant determinant of interictal biomarker variability, and exceeds the impact of all other confounding factors regarding biomarker rates, distribution, and EZ localization. Significance: These findings highlight the importance of vigilance state over ASM tapering, supporting the potential use of interictal biomarkers for EZ localization, regardless of ASM adjustments.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
30210 - Clinical neurology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/LX22NPO5107" target="_blank" >LX22NPO5107: Národní ústav pro neurologický výzkum</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2025
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Clinical Neurophysiology
ISSN
1388-2457
e-ISSN
1872-8952
Svazek periodika
177
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
September
Stát vydavatele periodika
IE - Irsko
Počet stran výsledku
10
Strana od-do
2110825
Kód UT WoS článku
001555554600002
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—