Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

The state of vigilance and not antiseizure medication dosage drive variability in interictal epilepsy biomarkers

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081731%3A_____%2F25%3A00638567" target="_blank" >RIV/68081731:_____/25:00638567 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Nalezeny alternativní kódy

    RIV/00159816:_____/25:00082392 RIV/00216224:14110/25:00141884 RIV/00216305:26220/26:0199134

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245725006777" target="_blank" >https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1388245725006777</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

    <a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110825" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.clinph.2025.2110825</a>

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    The state of vigilance and not antiseizure medication dosage drive variability in interictal epilepsy biomarkers

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Objective: During presurgical intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) investigation, anti-seizure medication (ASM) is typically tapered to record seizures. Interictal biomarkers are critical for epileptogenic zone (EZ) localization. This study examines how ASM tapering and other confounding factors influence the rates and localization accuracy of interictal iEEG biomarkers. Methods: iEEG data from 19 patients were analyzed during two 24 h sections separated by at least seven days during > 10-day iEEG monitoring. ASM dosage, vigilance state, time of day, seizure proximity, and duration of monitoring were evaluated for their impact on interictal biomarker rates, spatial distribution and localization of the EZ. Results: Biomarker rates, spatial distributions, and EZ localization did not significantly differ between the two 24hour sections. The state of vigilance emerged as the most significant contributor explaining 22.7 % of the variability. Seizure proximity, time of day and ASM dosage contributed minimally, each accounting for <= 3.7 % of the variability. Conclusions: The state of vigilance is the most significant determinant of interictal biomarker variability, and exceeds the impact of all other confounding factors regarding biomarker rates, distribution, and EZ localization. Significance: These findings highlight the importance of vigilance state over ASM tapering, supporting the potential use of interictal biomarkers for EZ localization, regardless of ASM adjustments.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    The state of vigilance and not antiseizure medication dosage drive variability in interictal epilepsy biomarkers

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Objective: During presurgical intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) investigation, anti-seizure medication (ASM) is typically tapered to record seizures. Interictal biomarkers are critical for epileptogenic zone (EZ) localization. This study examines how ASM tapering and other confounding factors influence the rates and localization accuracy of interictal iEEG biomarkers. Methods: iEEG data from 19 patients were analyzed during two 24 h sections separated by at least seven days during > 10-day iEEG monitoring. ASM dosage, vigilance state, time of day, seizure proximity, and duration of monitoring were evaluated for their impact on interictal biomarker rates, spatial distribution and localization of the EZ. Results: Biomarker rates, spatial distributions, and EZ localization did not significantly differ between the two 24hour sections. The state of vigilance emerged as the most significant contributor explaining 22.7 % of the variability. Seizure proximity, time of day and ASM dosage contributed minimally, each accounting for <= 3.7 % of the variability. Conclusions: The state of vigilance is the most significant determinant of interictal biomarker variability, and exceeds the impact of all other confounding factors regarding biomarker rates, distribution, and EZ localization. Significance: These findings highlight the importance of vigilance state over ASM tapering, supporting the potential use of interictal biomarkers for EZ localization, regardless of ASM adjustments.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    30210 - Clinical neurology

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

    <a href="/cs/project/LX22NPO5107" target="_blank" >LX22NPO5107: Národní ústav pro neurologický výzkum</a><br>

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2025

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Clinical Neurophysiology

  • ISSN

    1388-2457

  • e-ISSN

    1872-8952

  • Svazek periodika

    177

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    September

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    IE - Irsko

  • Počet stran výsledku

    10

  • Strana od-do

    2110825

  • Kód UT WoS článku

    001555554600002

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus