Psychometric Properties of Czech Versions of Academic and Social Selection, Optimization and Compensation Questionnaires
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081740%3A_____%2F21%3A00551097" target="_blank" >RIV/68081740:_____/21:00551097 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/00216224:14110/21:00123909
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://journals.savba.sk/index.php/studiapsychologica/article/view/368/91" target="_blank" >https://journals.savba.sk/index.php/studiapsychologica/article/view/368/91</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.31577/sp.2021.04.834" target="_blank" >10.31577/sp.2021.04.834</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Psychometric Properties of Czech Versions of Academic and Social Selection, Optimization and Compensation Questionnaires
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
The study deals with the psychometric characteristics of the Czech versions of Academic and Social Selection, Optimization, and Compensation (SOC) questionnaires. Self-report data were collected in a sample of 618 university students aged between 19 and 30 years. McDonald's omega coefficient was used for reliability estimation, construct validity was tested by confirmatory factor analysis and principal component analysis. Criterion validity was tested in a series of regression analyses. The instruments showed adequate reliability, ranging from 0.73 to 0.84 for Academic SOC and from 0.70 to 0.79 for Social SOC scales. Confirmatory factor analysis did not corroborate the original model proposed by Geldhof et al. (2012), except for the Loss-Based Selection factor. Post-hoc exploratory principal component analysis further supported these results. It turned out that the items were clustered according to different criteria compared to the original dimensions. Our results are in line with more recent findings, pointing to differences in the structure and employment of SOC strategies in young and older adults. We recommend that the Academic and Social SOC are revised in accordance with these recent findings and other methodological considerations.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Psychometric Properties of Czech Versions of Academic and Social Selection, Optimization and Compensation Questionnaires
Popis výsledku anglicky
The study deals with the psychometric characteristics of the Czech versions of Academic and Social Selection, Optimization, and Compensation (SOC) questionnaires. Self-report data were collected in a sample of 618 university students aged between 19 and 30 years. McDonald's omega coefficient was used for reliability estimation, construct validity was tested by confirmatory factor analysis and principal component analysis. Criterion validity was tested in a series of regression analyses. The instruments showed adequate reliability, ranging from 0.73 to 0.84 for Academic SOC and from 0.70 to 0.79 for Social SOC scales. Confirmatory factor analysis did not corroborate the original model proposed by Geldhof et al. (2012), except for the Loss-Based Selection factor. Post-hoc exploratory principal component analysis further supported these results. It turned out that the items were clustered according to different criteria compared to the original dimensions. Our results are in line with more recent findings, pointing to differences in the structure and employment of SOC strategies in young and older adults. We recommend that the Academic and Social SOC are revised in accordance with these recent findings and other methodological considerations.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA18-11996S" target="_blank" >GA18-11996S: Charakteristiky a prediktory sociálního a psychologického přizpůsobení v mladé dospělosti: Longitudinální studie</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Studia Psychologica
ISSN
0039-3320
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
63
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
4
Stát vydavatele periodika
SK - Slovenská republika
Počet stran výsledku
24
Strana od-do
369-392
Kód UT WoS článku
000733419400001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85122580716