Triangulation of theoretical and empirical conceptualizations related to the rule of law

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68081740%3A_____%2F23%3A00563548" target="_blank" >RIV/68081740:_____/23:00563548 - isvavai.cz</a>

Nalezeny alternativní kódy

RIV/00216208:11220/22:10450919 RIV/00216224:14210/23:00130055

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40803-022-00181-x" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40803-022-00181-x</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40803-022-00181-x" target="_blank" >10.1007/s40803-022-00181-x</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Triangulation of theoretical and empirical conceptualizations related to the rule of law

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Triangulation of the various methodological approaches towards the rule of law is highly desirable since it allows the combination of benefits and elimination of problematic aspects in each. The present article triangulates the conceptualizations of three approaches relating to the rule of law, namely Bedner’s review of the rule of law theories, the World Justice Project’s Rule of Law Index, and the review by Horák et al. of empirical measurement of legal consciousness, and identifies the most significant problem as a lack of communication between them. More precisely, the theoretical conceptualizations are not fully prepared for empirical measurement, and the empirical tools do not reflect the theoretical debate and its outcomes. Therefore, a new conceptualization of the rule of law is proposed to overcome these issues and consequently make the empirical measurement more valid.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Triangulation of theoretical and empirical conceptualizations related to the rule of law

Popis výsledku anglicky

Triangulation of the various methodological approaches towards the rule of law is highly desirable since it allows the combination of benefits and elimination of problematic aspects in each. The present article triangulates the conceptualizations of three approaches relating to the rule of law, namely Bedner’s review of the rule of law theories, the World Justice Project’s Rule of Law Index, and the review by Horák et al. of empirical measurement of legal consciousness, and identifies the most significant problem as a lack of communication between them. More precisely, the theoretical conceptualizations are not fully prepared for empirical measurement, and the empirical tools do not reflect the theoretical debate and its outcomes. Therefore, a new conceptualization of the rule of law is proposed to overcome these issues and consequently make the empirical measurement more valid.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50101 - Psychology (including human - machine relations)

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/LX22NPO5101" target="_blank" >LX22NPO5101: Národní institut pro výzkum socioekonomických dopadů nemocí a systémových rizik</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Hague Journal on the Rule of Law

ISSN

1876-4045

e-ISSN

1876-4053

Svazek periodika

15

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

1

Stát vydavatele periodika

AT - Rakouská republika

Počet stran výsledku

26

Strana od-do

191-216

Kód UT WoS článku

000878478900001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85141127023