Aspect and Tense usage in Upper Sorbian and Czech Narrative Texts

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378017%3A_____%2F13%3A00421538" target="_blank" >RIV/68378017:_____/13:00421538 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Aspect and Tense usage in Upper Sorbian and Czech Narrative Texts

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

While in Russian narrative texts, the historical present must be used with ipf. verbs (Panzer 1963, 99) and in chains of events pf. verbs are obligatory, both claims do not hold for Czech and Upper Sorbian (Breu 2000a, 49; ). According to Dickey (2000 and 2008), Czech and Sorbian share the same features with respect to their aspect system with other Western Slavic languages. For modern Upper Sorbian, recent changes of the aspect distinction were described (Breu 2000b and Toops 2001), but for older texts, the same features of aspect should be relevant as for Czech (Dickey 2008, 97). As is widely known, there is a number of differences between the two Western Slavic languages as well: in Czech, only the historical present and perfect tense can be used. For literal Upper Sorbian, in addition, the usage of synthetic preterite forms is typical for narrative texts, which were lost in Czech already by the 16th century. This presentation focuses on the aspect choice and its functions in presen

Název v anglickém jazyce

Aspect and Tense usage in Upper Sorbian and Czech Narrative Texts

Popis výsledku anglicky

While in Russian narrative texts, the historical present must be used with ipf. verbs (Panzer 1963, 99) and in chains of events pf. verbs are obligatory, both claims do not hold for Czech and Upper Sorbian (Breu 2000a, 49; ). According to Dickey (2000 and 2008), Czech and Sorbian share the same features with respect to their aspect system with other Western Slavic languages. For modern Upper Sorbian, recent changes of the aspect distinction were described (Breu 2000b and Toops 2001), but for older texts, the same features of aspect should be relevant as for Czech (Dickey 2008, 97). As is widely known, there is a number of differences between the two Western Slavic languages as well: in Czech, only the historical present and perfect tense can be used. For literal Upper Sorbian, in addition, the usage of synthetic preterite forms is typical for narrative texts, which were lost in Czech already by the 16th century. This presentation focuses on the aspect choice and its functions in presen

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

AI - Jazykověda

OECD FORD obor

—

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GPP406%2F11%2FP424" target="_blank" >GPP406/11/P424: Distribuce a funkce minulých tvarů ve starší lužické srbštině, staré češtině a staré polštině</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2013

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Semantičeskij spektr slavjanskogo vida. 4 Konferencija Komissii po aspektologii Meždunarodnogo Komiteta Slavistov. Geteborgskij universitet, 10 ijunija - 14 ijunija 2013 g

ISBN

978-91-86094-62-1

ISSN

2000-1134

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

2

Strana od-do

42-43

Název nakladatele

Göteborgs Universitet

Místo vydání

Göteborg

Místo konání akce

Göteborg Universitet

Datum konání akce

10. 6. 2013

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—