Setting Social Status in Couples and in Partners’ Budgetary Discretion in Central European Countries

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378025%3A_____%2F19%3A00518703" target="_blank" >RIV/68378025:_____/19:00518703 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://sreview.soc.cas.cz/cs/issue/204-sociologicky-casopis-czech-sociological-review-6-2019/3949" target="_blank" >http://sreview.soc.cas.cz/cs/issue/204-sociologicky-casopis-czech-sociological-review-6-2019/3949</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.13060/00380288.2020.55.6.492" target="_blank" >10.13060/00380288.2020.55.6.492</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Setting Social Status in Couples and in Partners’ Budgetary Discretion in Central European Countries

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

The conventional optics of social stratification research—in which the social position of the family unit is seen as being determined by the status of the male head of the household—has been challenged since the early 1970s. Economic research has also questioned the approach that views the household as a single unit. Given the changing circumstances affecting the family and the increasing proportion of couples with female primacy in terms of earnings, education, and socio-economic category, these approaches should be re-formulated. To demonstrate the issue, the authors use the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions survey (EU-SILC) for five Central European countries (the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, and Austria) in two ways. Using its 2006–2016 time series, they show the characteristics of partners in couples and the relations between them. While the share of dual-earner couples increased in all of the countries analysed, the percentage of couples with dependent children decreased and the percentage of cohabitating couples increased. Female primacy has increased in some criteria – earnings, education, socio-economic category – in all countries except Hungary. Also, using the EU-SILC 2010 ‘Module on Intra-household Sharing of Resources’, the authors test the hypothesis that there might be a direct link between partners’ social status split and separate welfare status. Social status split is assumed to be proxied by female primacy in relevant characteristics, while separate welfare status is indicated by partners’ budgetary discretion. The analysis produces somewhat ambiguous results, supporting the hypothesis for Austria, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia, but not for Hungary and Poland. Apart from the personal factors of social status split, two family factors are strongly related to the probability of the budgetary discretion of couple partners across all countries: household income and marital status.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Setting Social Status in Couples and in Partners’ Budgetary Discretion in Central European Countries

Popis výsledku anglicky

The conventional optics of social stratification research—in which the social position of the family unit is seen as being determined by the status of the male head of the household—has been challenged since the early 1970s. Economic research has also questioned the approach that views the household as a single unit. Given the changing circumstances affecting the family and the increasing proportion of couples with female primacy in terms of earnings, education, and socio-economic category, these approaches should be re-formulated. To demonstrate the issue, the authors use the European Union Statistics on Income and Living Conditions survey (EU-SILC) for five Central European countries (the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Slovakia, and Austria) in two ways. Using its 2006–2016 time series, they show the characteristics of partners in couples and the relations between them. While the share of dual-earner couples increased in all of the countries analysed, the percentage of couples with dependent children decreased and the percentage of cohabitating couples increased. Female primacy has increased in some criteria – earnings, education, socio-economic category – in all countries except Hungary. Also, using the EU-SILC 2010 ‘Module on Intra-household Sharing of Resources’, the authors test the hypothesis that there might be a direct link between partners’ social status split and separate welfare status. Social status split is assumed to be proxied by female primacy in relevant characteristics, while separate welfare status is indicated by partners’ budgetary discretion. The analysis produces somewhat ambiguous results, supporting the hypothesis for Austria, the Czech Republic, and Slovakia, but not for Hungary and Poland. Apart from the personal factors of social status split, two family factors are strongly related to the probability of the budgetary discretion of couple partners across all countries: household income and marital status.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50401 - Sociology

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA18-09220S" target="_blank" >GA18-09220S: Sociální stratifikace v České republice a střední Evropě: 1968-2018</a><br>

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2019

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review

ISSN

0038-0288

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

55

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

6

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

29

Strana od-do

791-820

Kód UT WoS článku

000512889600004

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—