International recognition, religion, and the status of Western Sahara
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378025%3A_____%2F21%3A00559330" target="_blank" >RIV/68378025:_____/21:00559330 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41269-020-00166-4" target="_blank" >https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/s41269-020-00166-4</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s41269-020-00166-4" target="_blank" >10.1057/s41269-020-00166-4</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
International recognition, religion, and the status of Western Sahara
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
How do countries decide whether or not to recognize an aspiring state? We examine such decisions in the context of contested recognition, which we define as a claim to statehood that is recognized by a large number of countries, but remains unrecognized by many others. We suggest that religion-both at the domestic level via religious regulation and discrimination against minority religions and at the international level via transnational religious ties-shapes recognition decisions. In cases where the two parties to a recognition dispute share the same dominant religious tradition (as in Western Sahara), transnational religious ties are expected to lead to external support for the side that emphasizes its religious identity and that has access to more resources. Moreover, we show that countries with higher levels of religious regulation are less likely to extend recognition. We assess these two conjectures for why some countries-but not others-have recognized the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic as an independent state using data on the recognition decisions of all 192 United Nations member states.
Název v anglickém jazyce
International recognition, religion, and the status of Western Sahara
Popis výsledku anglicky
How do countries decide whether or not to recognize an aspiring state? We examine such decisions in the context of contested recognition, which we define as a claim to statehood that is recognized by a large number of countries, but remains unrecognized by many others. We suggest that religion-both at the domestic level via religious regulation and discrimination against minority religions and at the international level via transnational religious ties-shapes recognition decisions. In cases where the two parties to a recognition dispute share the same dominant religious tradition (as in Western Sahara), transnational religious ties are expected to lead to external support for the side that emphasizes its religious identity and that has access to more resources. Moreover, we show that countries with higher levels of religious regulation are less likely to extend recognition. We assess these two conjectures for why some countries-but not others-have recognized the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic as an independent state using data on the recognition decisions of all 192 United Nations member states.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
50601 - Political science
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Acta Politica
ISSN
0001-6810
e-ISSN
1741-1416
Svazek periodika
56
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
3
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
19
Strana od-do
548-566
Kód UT WoS článku
000535150000001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85085519455