In Vitro Comparison of Passive and Active Clinical Proton Beams
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378050%3A_____%2F20%3A00539168" target="_blank" >RIV/68378050:_____/20:00539168 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/16/5650" target="_blank" >https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/16/5650</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms21165650" target="_blank" >10.3390/ijms21165650</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
In Vitro Comparison of Passive and Active Clinical Proton Beams
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Nowadays, the irradiation methodology in proton therapy is switching from the use of passively scattered beams to active pencil beams due to the possibility of more conformal dose distributions. The dose rates of active pencil beams are much higher than those of passive beams. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there is any difference in the biological effectiveness of these passive and active irradiation modes. The beam qualities of double scattering and pencil beam scanning were measured dosimetrically and simulated using the Monte Carlo code. Using the medulloblastoma cell line DAOY, we performed an in vitro comparison of the two modes in two positions along the dose-deposition curve plateau and inside the Bragg peak. We followed the clonogenic cell survival, apoptosis, micronuclei, and gamma H2AX assays as biological endpoints. The Monte Carlo simulations did not reveal any difference between the beam qualities of the two modes. Furthermore, we did not observe any statistically significant difference between the two modes in the in vitro comparison of any of the examined biological endpoints. Our results do not show any biologically relevant differences related to the different dose rates of passive and active proton beams.
Název v anglickém jazyce
In Vitro Comparison of Passive and Active Clinical Proton Beams
Popis výsledku anglicky
Nowadays, the irradiation methodology in proton therapy is switching from the use of passively scattered beams to active pencil beams due to the possibility of more conformal dose distributions. The dose rates of active pencil beams are much higher than those of passive beams. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether there is any difference in the biological effectiveness of these passive and active irradiation modes. The beam qualities of double scattering and pencil beam scanning were measured dosimetrically and simulated using the Monte Carlo code. Using the medulloblastoma cell line DAOY, we performed an in vitro comparison of the two modes in two positions along the dose-deposition curve plateau and inside the Bragg peak. We followed the clonogenic cell survival, apoptosis, micronuclei, and gamma H2AX assays as biological endpoints. The Monte Carlo simulations did not reveal any difference between the beam qualities of the two modes. Furthermore, we did not observe any statistically significant difference between the two modes in the in vitro comparison of any of the examined biological endpoints. Our results do not show any biologically relevant differences related to the different dose rates of passive and active proton beams.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
10601 - Cell biology
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/LM2015063" target="_blank" >LM2015063: Národní infrastruktura chemické biologie</a><br>
Návaznosti
I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2020
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
ISSN
1422-0067
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
21
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
16
Stát vydavatele periodika
CH - Švýcarská konfederace
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
5650
Kód UT WoS článku
000565090200001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—