This is not our Literature. Censorship of Czech fiction under narmalization

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378068%3A_____%2F15%3A00502970" target="_blank" >RIV/68378068:_____/15:00502970 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

polština

Název v původním jazyce

To nie nasza literatura. Cenzura czeskiej beletrystyki w czasach normalizacji

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Przedmiotem zainteresowania artykułu jest cenzura literacka w Czechosłowacji w latach 70. i 80. oraz obserwacja tych obszarów literatury, które były przemilczane lub marginalizowane w okresie normalizacji. Metodologiczną podstawę dla artykułu stanowi teoria komunikacji literackiej, pewne aspekty new censorship i ich krytyczne ujęcie zaproponowane przez niemiecko-angielską badaczkę Beate Müller.

Název v anglickém jazyce

This is not our Literature. Censorship of Czech fiction under narmalization

Popis výsledku anglicky

This study focuses on literary censorship in Czechoslovakia during the 1970s and 1980s, observing the types of literature that were suppressed or marginalized under normalization. In methodological terms, it is based on the theory of literary communication, some new censorship ideas and their critical revision by the German English scholar Beate Müller. The introductory section presents a characterization of the Soviet-style censorship system, which the author describes as a “dispersed” censorship system, i.e. a multi-level supervision and regulation system, with approval at the state, government and corporate levels, while the supreme ideological and arbitration authority rested permanently with the Communist Party Central supreme ideological and arbitration authority rested permanently with the Communist Party Central Committee, the management and planning centred around the Ministry in charge and the third mainstay of supervision over books was the approvals procedure at individual publishers’ based on “readership procedures”. Only between 1953 and 1968 was there also a bureau specializing in preliminary censorship (the Central Press Supervision Authority), however, its functions were basically just regulatory, as it primarily acted as a check against potential breakdowns in other components of the dispersed censorship system. The second part of the paper presents the main types of literature that were suppressed by censorship. It points out the particular prudishness of normalization censorship, the suppression of vulgarisms, expressivity and sexuality. Another marginalized area was that of literary experimentation, comics and the anti-utopia genre.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

60206 - Specific literatures

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2015

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Studia slavica

ISSN

1803-5663

e-ISSN

—

Svazek periodika

19

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

2

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

11

Strana od-do

115-125

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—