Self-restraint of the CEE Constitutional courts: Does it exist and shall it exist?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378122%3A_____%2F18%3A00503147" target="_blank" >RIV/68378122:_____/18:00503147 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Self-restraint of the CEE Constitutional courts: Does it exist and shall it exist?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Workshop organized by the Department of Political Sciences and Sociology (Faculty of Law, Charles University) and Institute of State and Law (Czech Academy of Sciences) on 27 October 2018. In post-1989 Central Eastern Europe, the debate between lawyers, political scientists and the general public has markedly focused on the rise of the judiciary and the issue of judicial activism. Although such focus is fully understandable and legitimate in the circumstances of the transformation of the role of the judiciary, far more limited attention has been paid to cases in which courts including constitutional courts in this region have exhibited (at least some) judicial self-restraint. The overall aim of the workshop shall be to shed more light on 1) whether any coherent theory and practice of judicial self-restraint exists, emerges or might emerge in the countries of Central Eastern Europe, 2) what mechanisms courts employ when they intend to exercise self-restraint and 3) what the most frequent or important cases are in which judicial self-restraint takes place. A related question shall be what legal and/or political reasons stand or might stand behind judicial self-restraint or judicial deference in Central Eastern Europe.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Self-restraint of the CEE Constitutional courts: Does it exist and shall it exist?

Popis výsledku anglicky

Workshop organized by the Department of Political Sciences and Sociology (Faculty of Law, Charles University) and Institute of State and Law (Czech Academy of Sciences) on 27 October 2018. In post-1989 Central Eastern Europe, the debate between lawyers, political scientists and the general public has markedly focused on the rise of the judiciary and the issue of judicial activism. Although such focus is fully understandable and legitimate in the circumstances of the transformation of the role of the judiciary, far more limited attention has been paid to cases in which courts including constitutional courts in this region have exhibited (at least some) judicial self-restraint. The overall aim of the workshop shall be to shed more light on 1) whether any coherent theory and practice of judicial self-restraint exists, emerges or might emerge in the countries of Central Eastern Europe, 2) what mechanisms courts employ when they intend to exercise self-restraint and 3) what the most frequent or important cases are in which judicial self-restraint takes place. A related question shall be what legal and/or political reasons stand or might stand behind judicial self-restraint or judicial deference in Central Eastern Europe.

Druh

W - Uspořádání workshopu

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/GA17-08176S" target="_blank" >GA17-08176S: Ústavní soud ČR: strážce ústavy nad politikou nebo v politice?</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2018

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Místo konání akce

Praha

Stát konání akce

CZ - Česká republika

Datum zahájení akce

—

Datum ukončení akce

—

Celkový počet účastníků

25

Počet zahraničních účastníků

10

Typ akce podle státní přísl. účastníků

EUR - Evropská akce