What we talk about when we talk about rights of future generations in climate litigation?

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68378122%3A_____%2F22%3A00564552" target="_blank" >RIV/68378122:_____/22:00564552 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

—

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

What we talk about when we talk about rights of future generations in climate litigation?

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This contribution focuses on granting standing to future generations in existing climate change case law. First, the contribution presents some findings on theory and then moves to case study. As an example of positive approach of the court in granting standing to future generations in environmental issues is demonstrated the case Minors Oposa from 1994. Then, current Climate change litigation cases involving children, youth or future generations are analysed. The contribution identifies several ways the courts are approaching standing to future generations: negative, avoiding, positive, and some border approaches. Finally, this contribution argues, that he success of Oposa was already reached in Climate change litigation (see Urgenda, Future Generations, Neubauer, or Milieudefensie).n

Název v anglickém jazyce

What we talk about when we talk about rights of future generations in climate litigation?

Popis výsledku anglicky

This contribution focuses on granting standing to future generations in existing climate change case law. First, the contribution presents some findings on theory and then moves to case study. As an example of positive approach of the court in granting standing to future generations in environmental issues is demonstrated the case Minors Oposa from 1994. Then, current Climate change litigation cases involving children, youth or future generations are analysed. The contribution identifies several ways the courts are approaching standing to future generations: negative, avoiding, positive, and some border approaches. Finally, this contribution argues, that he success of Oposa was already reached in Climate change litigation (see Urgenda, Future Generations, Neubauer, or Milieudefensie).n

Druh

O - Ostatní výsledky

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

50501 - Law

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů