Vše

Co hledáte?

Vše
Projekty
Výsledky výzkumu
Subjekty

Rychlé hledání

  • Projekty podpořené TA ČR
  • Významné projekty
  • Projekty s nejvyšší státní podporou
  • Aktuálně běžící projekty

Chytré vyhledávání

  • Takto najdu konkrétní +slovo
  • Takto z výsledků -slovo zcela vynechám
  • “Takto můžu najít celou frázi”

Modelling a Masonry Arch Bridge – Comparing Methods

Identifikátory výsledku

  • Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

    <a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F19%3A00339401" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/19:00339401 - isvavai.cz</a>

  • Výsledek na webu

    <a href="https://www.masonry.org.uk/downloads/modelling-a-masonry-arch-bridge-comparing-methods" target="_blank" >https://www.masonry.org.uk/downloads/modelling-a-masonry-arch-bridge-comparing-methods</a>

  • DOI - Digital Object Identifier

Alternativní jazyky

  • Jazyk výsledku

    angličtina

  • Název v původním jazyce

    Modelling a Masonry Arch Bridge – Comparing Methods

  • Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

    Masonry arch bridges are used in highway and rail systems throughout the world. Many of these are more than a century old, and experience much higher live loads than originally designed. Due to age and new live load criteria, it is often necessary to evaluate the existing load capacity. Despite masonry’s wide use, it is only recently that scientific approaches to design and analysis have been developed, but there is a lack of consensus on the conservativeness, simplifications used, and modelling rigor required. The primary purpose of this study is to compare various analysis methods, evaluating the results from the point of view of structural response, modelling efficiency, and variations in the inputs and assumptions used. The techniques considered include limit analysis using hand calculations, rigid-block analysis, finite element analysis using a smeared crack model, and finite element analysis using a discrete crack model. To demonstrate the methods, a 19th-century two-span stone masonry arch in Troy, NY, USA is used as a case study. The bridge underwent a significant intervention in 1986 in which the infill and spandrel walls were removed and replaced. At the time, the bridge was rated by idealizing the bridge as a series of elastic beams. The compressive stress and percent contact area were limited to allowable design values. A secondary purpose of this research was to compare the results of the elastic analysis with the results of the modern analyses, and to provide an updated load rating.

  • Název v anglickém jazyce

    Modelling a Masonry Arch Bridge – Comparing Methods

  • Popis výsledku anglicky

    Masonry arch bridges are used in highway and rail systems throughout the world. Many of these are more than a century old, and experience much higher live loads than originally designed. Due to age and new live load criteria, it is often necessary to evaluate the existing load capacity. Despite masonry’s wide use, it is only recently that scientific approaches to design and analysis have been developed, but there is a lack of consensus on the conservativeness, simplifications used, and modelling rigor required. The primary purpose of this study is to compare various analysis methods, evaluating the results from the point of view of structural response, modelling efficiency, and variations in the inputs and assumptions used. The techniques considered include limit analysis using hand calculations, rigid-block analysis, finite element analysis using a smeared crack model, and finite element analysis using a discrete crack model. To demonstrate the methods, a 19th-century two-span stone masonry arch in Troy, NY, USA is used as a case study. The bridge underwent a significant intervention in 1986 in which the infill and spandrel walls were removed and replaced. At the time, the bridge was rated by idealizing the bridge as a series of elastic beams. The compressive stress and percent contact area were limited to allowable design values. A secondary purpose of this research was to compare the results of the elastic analysis with the results of the modern analyses, and to provide an updated load rating.

Klasifikace

  • Druh

    J<sub>SC</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi SCOPUS

  • CEP obor

  • OECD FORD obor

    20101 - Civil engineering

Návaznosti výsledku

  • Projekt

  • Návaznosti

    I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Ostatní

  • Rok uplatnění

    2019

  • Kód důvěrnosti údajů

    S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku

  • Název periodika

    Masonry International

  • ISSN

    0950-2289

  • e-ISSN

  • Svazek periodika

    32

  • Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

    1

  • Stát vydavatele periodika

    GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

  • Počet stran výsledku

    12

  • Strana od-do

    23-34

  • Kód UT WoS článku

  • EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

    2-s2.0-85072038830