Load Carrying Capacity Of Masonry Arch Railway Bridges at the Serviceability Limit State

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F22%3A00356227" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/22:00356227 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://ojs.cvut.cz/ojs/index.php/ap/issue/archive" target="_blank" >https://ojs.cvut.cz/ojs/index.php/ap/issue/archive</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Load Carrying Capacity Of Masonry Arch Railway Bridges at the Serviceability Limit State

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This article focuses on masonry arch railway bridges. The main topic is the algorithm which was developed for the purpose of non-linear arch bridge analysis. The sensitivity analysis of the input parameters of the calculation was carried out. Subsequently, the study was carried out for the comparison of four calculation methods. For this comparison, a set of arch bridges were chosen. The two methods used commercial software, and two other methods were then developed. One of the developed algorithms uses a simple linear calculation. The second developed algorithm uses an iterative approach to handle material and geometrical non-linearity. The first commercial software method uses 2D non-linear models, the second method is a limit collapse analysis using the software LimitState:RING. These three methods were developed to handle the SLS (serviceability limit state) criteria, and their results were compared to the result of LCC at the ULS (ultimate LS) using LimitState:RING.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Load Carrying Capacity Of Masonry Arch Railway Bridges at the Serviceability Limit State

Popis výsledku anglicky

This article focuses on masonry arch railway bridges. The main topic is the algorithm which was developed for the purpose of non-linear arch bridge analysis. The sensitivity analysis of the input parameters of the calculation was carried out. Subsequently, the study was carried out for the comparison of four calculation methods. For this comparison, a set of arch bridges were chosen. The two methods used commercial software, and two other methods were then developed. One of the developed algorithms uses a simple linear calculation. The second developed algorithm uses an iterative approach to handle material and geometrical non-linearity. The first commercial software method uses 2D non-linear models, the second method is a limit collapse analysis using the software LimitState:RING. These three methods were developed to handle the SLS (serviceability limit state) criteria, and their results were compared to the result of LCC at the ULS (ultimate LS) using LimitState:RING.

Druh

J_ost - Ostatní články v recenzovaných periodicích

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20104 - Transport engineering

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Acta Polytechnica

ISSN

2336-5382

e-ISSN

2336-5382

Svazek periodika

61

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

7

Stát vydavatele periodika

CZ - Česká republika

Počet stran výsledku

14

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

—

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

—