3D Printed house Vs. Ordinary Construction

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F22%3A00368399" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/22:00368399 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="http://www.conference-cm.com" target="_blank" >http://www.conference-cm.com</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

—

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

3D Printed house Vs. Ordinary Construction

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Contour crafting is the new trend for many construction companies who want to differentiate themselves from their competitors and be able to present a winning alternative to their customers. This technology promises short construction times, advantageous costs for the customer, and a focus on lowering CO2 emissions. But in reality these considerations are either true or false. The more constructions we see being realised with this technology, the more we hear some conflicts with these key points. The article will help to better understand the strong and weak aspects, of this technology, by comparing the costs of the material for 3D printer with ordinary materials for the realisation of two-story family house in Prague. Porotherm, Ytong and reinforced concrete for the only vertical elements will be compared with printable concreate with additive and dry mortar mix. We will try to understand whether the promises made are well-founded, or whether they are part of a banal marketing campaign. Results will be used by the author for further insights.

Název v anglickém jazyce

3D Printed house Vs. Ordinary Construction

Popis výsledku anglicky

Contour crafting is the new trend for many construction companies who want to differentiate themselves from their competitors and be able to present a winning alternative to their customers. This technology promises short construction times, advantageous costs for the customer, and a focus on lowering CO2 emissions. But in reality these considerations are either true or false. The more constructions we see being realised with this technology, the more we hear some conflicts with these key points. The article will help to better understand the strong and weak aspects, of this technology, by comparing the costs of the material for 3D printer with ordinary materials for the realisation of two-story family house in Prague. Porotherm, Ytong and reinforced concrete for the only vertical elements will be compared with printable concreate with additive and dry mortar mix. We will try to understand whether the promises made are well-founded, or whether they are part of a banal marketing campaign. Results will be used by the author for further insights.

Druh

D - Stať ve sborníku

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20101 - Civil engineering

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

I - Institucionalni podpora na dlouhodoby koncepcni rozvoj vyzkumne organizace

Rok uplatnění

2022

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název statě ve sborníku

Construction Maeconomics Conference (2022), Conference Proceedings

ISBN

978-80-01-07093-2

ISSN

—

e-ISSN

—

Počet stran výsledku

12

Strana od-do

—

Název nakladatele

CESKE VYSOKE UCENI TECHNICKE V PRAZE

Místo vydání

Praha

Místo konání akce

Praha

Datum konání akce

3. 11. 2022

Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti

EUR - Evropská akce

Kód UT WoS článku

—