Effect of number and surface area of the aggregates on machine learning prediction performance of recycled hot-mix asphalt
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F24%3A00376329" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/24:00376329 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137788" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137788</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137788" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.137788</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Effect of number and surface area of the aggregates on machine learning prediction performance of recycled hot-mix asphalt
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
This study addresses the challenge of designing hot-mix asphalt by evaluating the impact of aggregate surface area (ASA) and the number of aggregates (NA) in machine learning (ML) models. A dataset of 107 asphalt mixtures containing 0–50 % reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) was analyzed. Virgin aggregates and RAP particles were counted and measured via digital photography to calculate NA and ASA, with specific surface areas determined in a physics engine environment. Then, measured average aggregate particle weights were calibrated using 13 specimens. Various ML models were developed with the random forest algorithm, incorporating different input feature sets (IFS), including NA, ASA, and other basic features of the mixtures. Results revealed that including NA and ASA did not significantly improve model performance compared to using only gradation percentage inputs. Consequently, IFS-4, which includes only gradation inputs, was recommended for simplicity. The most crucial features were found to be gradation-related, with R(2) values around 0.90 and above achieved for stiffness modulus (ITSM), air voids, Marshall stability (MS), and theoretical maximum density (Gmm). Specifically, the test R(2) values for air voids, ITSM, and MS were 0.96, 0.89, and 0.87, with a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 5.8 %, 5.4 %, and 5.6 %, respectively. Predictions for Gmm demonstrated the highest performance across all metrics with an R(2) value of 0.99. Air void content predictions performed better than those for ITSM, MS, and MF regarding R(2) and mean squared error (MSE) values, although their MAPE values were similar. These findings suggest that while NA and ASA provide additional details, gradation features are the most critical inputs for accurate ML model predictions in asphalt mixture design.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Effect of number and surface area of the aggregates on machine learning prediction performance of recycled hot-mix asphalt
Popis výsledku anglicky
This study addresses the challenge of designing hot-mix asphalt by evaluating the impact of aggregate surface area (ASA) and the number of aggregates (NA) in machine learning (ML) models. A dataset of 107 asphalt mixtures containing 0–50 % reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) was analyzed. Virgin aggregates and RAP particles were counted and measured via digital photography to calculate NA and ASA, with specific surface areas determined in a physics engine environment. Then, measured average aggregate particle weights were calibrated using 13 specimens. Various ML models were developed with the random forest algorithm, incorporating different input feature sets (IFS), including NA, ASA, and other basic features of the mixtures. Results revealed that including NA and ASA did not significantly improve model performance compared to using only gradation percentage inputs. Consequently, IFS-4, which includes only gradation inputs, was recommended for simplicity. The most crucial features were found to be gradation-related, with R(2) values around 0.90 and above achieved for stiffness modulus (ITSM), air voids, Marshall stability (MS), and theoretical maximum density (Gmm). Specifically, the test R(2) values for air voids, ITSM, and MS were 0.96, 0.89, and 0.87, with a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 5.8 %, 5.4 %, and 5.6 %, respectively. Predictions for Gmm demonstrated the highest performance across all metrics with an R(2) value of 0.99. Air void content predictions performed better than those for ITSM, MS, and MF regarding R(2) and mean squared error (MSE) values, although their MAPE values were similar. These findings suggest that while NA and ASA provide additional details, gradation features are the most critical inputs for accurate ML model predictions in asphalt mixture design.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20101 - Civil engineering
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2024
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Construction and Building Materials
ISSN
0950-0618
e-ISSN
1879-0526
Svazek periodika
445
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
září
Stát vydavatele periodika
GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska
Počet stran výsledku
25
Strana od-do
—
Kód UT WoS článku
001297866900001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85201488750