Scanning the underground: Comparison of the accuracies of SLAM and static laser scanners in a mine tunnel

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21110%2F25%3A00377389" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21110/25:00377389 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115875" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115875</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115875" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.measurement.2024.115875</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Scanning the underground: Comparison of the accuracies of SLAM and static laser scanners in a mine tunnel

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Superior measurement speed is a great benefit of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) scanners, especially in enclosed spaces. Here, we (i) provided a workflow for testing both terrestrial static laser scanners and SLAM scanners in underground spaces, which can help to identify the partial components of the error, and (ii) using this workflow, we compared the performance of four SLAM and two terrestrial scanners in a mining environment (120 m long tunnel). Although SLAM scanners suffered from greater noise than static scanners, their performance was excellent, with root mean square deviations after primary georeferencing on control points within the range of 12–24 mm for SLAM and 22–27 mm for static scanners. This result, along with additional provided metrics, suggests that SLAM scanners of the new generation perform excellently in enclosed spaces which, along with their ease of use, makes them highly suitable for measurements in this type of environment.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Scanning the underground: Comparison of the accuracies of SLAM and static laser scanners in a mine tunnel

Popis výsledku anglicky

Superior measurement speed is a great benefit of Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) scanners, especially in enclosed spaces. Here, we (i) provided a workflow for testing both terrestrial static laser scanners and SLAM scanners in underground spaces, which can help to identify the partial components of the error, and (ii) using this workflow, we compared the performance of four SLAM and two terrestrial scanners in a mining environment (120 m long tunnel). Although SLAM scanners suffered from greater noise than static scanners, their performance was excellent, with root mean square deviations after primary georeferencing on control points within the range of 12–24 mm for SLAM and 22–27 mm for static scanners. This result, along with additional provided metrics, suggests that SLAM scanners of the new generation perform excellently in enclosed spaces which, along with their ease of use, makes them highly suitable for measurements in this type of environment.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20101 - Civil engineering

Projekt

<a href="/cs/project/CK03000168" target="_blank" >CK03000168: Inteligentní metody pořizování a analýzy digitálních dat pro inspekce mostů</a><br>

Návaznosti

P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)

Rok uplatnění

2025

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Measurement

ISSN

0263-2241

e-ISSN

1873-412X

Svazek periodika

242

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

242

Stát vydavatele periodika

NL - Nizozemsko

Počet stran výsledku

13

Strana od-do

—

Kód UT WoS článku

001332780400001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85205432607