Verification of Springback Analysis Accutacy in Deep Drawing Process with Focus on Initial Setting of Numerical Simulation
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21220%2F16%3A00305171" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21220/16:00305171 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Verification of Springback Analysis Accutacy in Deep Drawing Process with Focus on Initial Setting of Numerical Simulation
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Computation of the springback phenomenon in numerical simulations, together with its prediction, is very complex subject. Final results of the springback analysis are highly dependent on the initial FEM settings. Therefore, with the initial settings, final accuracy of the springback prediction can be influenced significantly. There are plenty of options in terms of initial FEM settings of the numerical simulation, for better understanding, the options were divided into two major categories. First group defines the element type, BEM type (Bending Enhanced Membrane), EPS type (Elastic Plastic Shell) or modified shell element type. Second group defines the density of the meshing (radius penetration, max element angle, master element size, etc.). The article “Verification Of Springback Analysis Accuracy In Deep Drawing Process With Focus On Initial Setting Of Numerical Simulation” focuses on springback analysis comparison in AutoForm R6 based on various FEM settings. For experiment, outer panel of fifth doors from SEAT Ateca was used.
Název v anglickém jazyce
Verification of Springback Analysis Accutacy in Deep Drawing Process with Focus on Initial Setting of Numerical Simulation
Popis výsledku anglicky
Computation of the springback phenomenon in numerical simulations, together with its prediction, is very complex subject. Final results of the springback analysis are highly dependent on the initial FEM settings. Therefore, with the initial settings, final accuracy of the springback prediction can be influenced significantly. There are plenty of options in terms of initial FEM settings of the numerical simulation, for better understanding, the options were divided into two major categories. First group defines the element type, BEM type (Bending Enhanced Membrane), EPS type (Elastic Plastic Shell) or modified shell element type. Second group defines the density of the meshing (radius penetration, max element angle, master element size, etc.). The article “Verification Of Springback Analysis Accuracy In Deep Drawing Process With Focus On Initial Setting Of Numerical Simulation” focuses on springback analysis comparison in AutoForm R6 based on various FEM settings. For experiment, outer panel of fifth doors from SEAT Ateca was used.
Klasifikace
Druh
D - Stať ve sborníku
CEP obor
JR - Ostatní strojírenství
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
—
Návaznosti
S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název statě ve sborníku
Metal 2016: 25th International Conference on Metallurgy and Materials
ISBN
978-80-87294-67-3
ISSN
—
e-ISSN
—
Počet stran výsledku
6
Strana od-do
464-469
Název nakladatele
Tanger
Místo vydání
Ostrava
Místo konání akce
Brno
Datum konání akce
25. 5. 2016
Typ akce podle státní příslušnosti
WRD - Celosvětová akce
Kód UT WoS článku
000391251200073