A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR CALCULATING NOTCH TIP STRAINS AND STRESSES UNDER MULTIAXIAL LOADING
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21220%2F16%3A00306065" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21220/16:00306065 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
—
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR CALCULATING NOTCH TIP STRAINS AND STRESSES UNDER MULTIAXIAL LOADING
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
. Selected methods for calculating notch tip strains and stresses in elastic–plastic isotropic bodies subjected to multiaxial monotonic loading were compared. The methods use sets of equations where hypothetical notch tip elastic strains and stresses obtained from FEM calculationsserve as an input. The comparison was performed within two separate groups of methods: the first group consists of the methods intended for cases of multiaxial proportional loading and the second group deals with multiaxial on proportional loading. Originally, the precision of the methods was validated by comparison with results obtained from elastic–plastic FEM analyses. Since computer performance at the time was lower than nowadays, verification of the proposed methods on FEM models with a finer mesh was needed. Such verification was carried out and is presented in this paper. The effect of various formulations of material stress–strain curve was also evaluated.
Název v anglickém jazyce
A COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR CALCULATING NOTCH TIP STRAINS AND STRESSES UNDER MULTIAXIAL LOADING
Popis výsledku anglicky
. Selected methods for calculating notch tip strains and stresses in elastic–plastic isotropic bodies subjected to multiaxial monotonic loading were compared. The methods use sets of equations where hypothetical notch tip elastic strains and stresses obtained from FEM calculationsserve as an input. The comparison was performed within two separate groups of methods: the first group consists of the methods intended for cases of multiaxial proportional loading and the second group deals with multiaxial on proportional loading. Originally, the precision of the methods was validated by comparison with results obtained from elastic–plastic FEM analyses. Since computer performance at the time was lower than nowadays, verification of the proposed methods on FEM models with a finer mesh was needed. Such verification was carried out and is presented in this paper. The effect of various formulations of material stress–strain curve was also evaluated.
Klasifikace
Druh
O - Ostatní výsledky
CEP obor
JL - Únava materiálu a lomová mechanika
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GA15-18274S" target="_blank" >GA15-18274S: Účinné metody odhadu životnosti pro obecné víceosé namáhání</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2016
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů