Techno-economic comparison of three technologies for precombustion CO2 capture from a lignite-fired IGCC

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21220%2F20%3A00335772" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21220/20:00335772 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-019-1870-8" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-019-1870-8</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11705-019-1870-8" target="_blank" >10.1007/s11705-019-1870-8</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Techno-economic comparison of three technologies for precombustion CO2 capture from a lignite-fired IGCC

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

This paper compares the techno-economic performances of three technologies for CO2 capture from a lignite-based IGCC power plant located in the Czech Republic: (1) Physical absorption with a Rectisol-based process; (2) Polymeric CO2-selective membrane-based capture; (3) Low-temperature capture. The evaluations show that the IGCC plant with CO2 capture leads to costs of electricity between 91 and 120 euro center dot MWh(-1), depending on the capture technology employed, compared to 65 euro center dot MWh(-1) for the power plant without capture. This results in CO2 avoidance costs ranging from 42 to 84 euro center dot tCO2,avoidedmainly linked to the losses in net power output. From both energy and cost points of view, the low-temperature and Rectisol based CO2 capture processes are the most efficient capture technologies. Furthermore, partial CO2 capture appears as a good mean to ensure early implementation due to the limited increase in CO2 avoidance cost when considering partial capture. To go beyond the two specific CO2-selective membranes considered, a cost/membrane property map for CO2-selective membranes was developed. This map emphasise the need to develop high performance membrane to compete with solvent technology. Finally, the cost of the whole CCS chain was estimated at 54 euro center dot tCO2,avoidedonce pipeline transport and storage are taken into consideration.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Techno-economic comparison of three technologies for precombustion CO2 capture from a lignite-fired IGCC

Popis výsledku anglicky

This paper compares the techno-economic performances of three technologies for CO2 capture from a lignite-based IGCC power plant located in the Czech Republic: (1) Physical absorption with a Rectisol-based process; (2) Polymeric CO2-selective membrane-based capture; (3) Low-temperature capture. The evaluations show that the IGCC plant with CO2 capture leads to costs of electricity between 91 and 120 euro center dot MWh(-1), depending on the capture technology employed, compared to 65 euro center dot MWh(-1) for the power plant without capture. This results in CO2 avoidance costs ranging from 42 to 84 euro center dot tCO2,avoidedmainly linked to the losses in net power output. From both energy and cost points of view, the low-temperature and Rectisol based CO2 capture processes are the most efficient capture technologies. Furthermore, partial CO2 capture appears as a good mean to ensure early implementation due to the limited increase in CO2 avoidance cost when considering partial capture. To go beyond the two specific CO2-selective membranes considered, a cost/membrane property map for CO2-selective membranes was developed. This map emphasise the need to develop high performance membrane to compete with solvent technology. Finally, the cost of the whole CCS chain was estimated at 54 euro center dot tCO2,avoidedonce pipeline transport and storage are taken into consideration.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20704 - Energy and fuels

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

V - Vyzkumna aktivita podporovana z jinych verejnych zdroju

Rok uplatnění

2020

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering

ISSN

2095-0179

e-ISSN

2095-0187

Svazek periodika

14

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

3

Stát vydavatele periodika

CH - Švýcarská konfederace

Počet stran výsledku

17

Strana od-do

436-452

Kód UT WoS článku

000492582300001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85067044729