A Technical and Economic Evaluation of Two Different Oxygen Sources for a Small Oxy-Combustion Unit
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21220%2F21%3A00349992" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21220/21:00349992 - isvavai.cz</a>
Výsledek na webu
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127427" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127427</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127427" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127427</a>
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
A Technical and Economic Evaluation of Two Different Oxygen Sources for a Small Oxy-Combustion Unit
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Oxy-combustion is a feasible CO2 capture method in the power and heat generation sector. This paper aims to propose a methodology for assessing two oxygen production technologies for small-scale oxy-combustion units: i) two-bed pressure swing adsorption (PSA), and ii) liquid oxygen delivery (LOX) for any local conditions, including the greenhouse gas (GHC) footprint for the oxygen that is produced. An analysis of PSA technology and LOX technology was carried out for the Czech Republic and for Germany, where the electricity, labor costs, and greenhouse gas (GHC) emission factors of electrical power differ considerably, but the equipment costs are similar. The analysis always has to be based on local prices, especially on the electricity price that is available for consumers operating PSA units and the price for liquid oxygen delivery, and also GHC emission factors for the electric energy produced in a given area or country. Depending on the local conditions, we may reach completely different conclusions concerning the technology that will be chosen for oxygen supply.
Název v anglickém jazyce
A Technical and Economic Evaluation of Two Different Oxygen Sources for a Small Oxy-Combustion Unit
Popis výsledku anglicky
Oxy-combustion is a feasible CO2 capture method in the power and heat generation sector. This paper aims to propose a methodology for assessing two oxygen production technologies for small-scale oxy-combustion units: i) two-bed pressure swing adsorption (PSA), and ii) liquid oxygen delivery (LOX) for any local conditions, including the greenhouse gas (GHC) footprint for the oxygen that is produced. An analysis of PSA technology and LOX technology was carried out for the Czech Republic and for Germany, where the electricity, labor costs, and greenhouse gas (GHC) emission factors of electrical power differ considerably, but the equipment costs are similar. The analysis always has to be based on local prices, especially on the electricity price that is available for consumers operating PSA units and the price for liquid oxygen delivery, and also GHC emission factors for the electric energy produced in a given area or country. Depending on the local conditions, we may reach completely different conclusions concerning the technology that will be chosen for oxygen supply.
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>imp</sub> - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science
CEP obor
—
OECD FORD obor
20704 - Energy and fuels
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/EF16_019%2F0000753" target="_blank" >EF16_019/0000753: Centrum výzkumu nízkouhlíkových energetických technologií</a><br>
Návaznosti
P - Projekt vyzkumu a vyvoje financovany z verejnych zdroju (s odkazem do CEP)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2021
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Journal of Cleaner Production
ISSN
0959-6526
e-ISSN
1879-1786
Svazek periodika
309
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
127427
Stát vydavatele periodika
NL - Nizozemsko
Počet stran výsledku
13
Strana od-do
—
Kód UT WoS článku
000662984900001
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
2-s2.0-85107644417