Blending in a spherical tank

Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI

<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21220%2F23%3A00361741" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21220/23:00361741 - isvavai.cz</a>

Výsledek na webu

<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2023.01.008" target="_blank" >https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2023.01.008</a>

DOI - Digital Object Identifier

<a href="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2023.01.008" target="_blank" >10.1016/j.cherd.2023.01.008</a>

Jazyk výsledku

angličtina

Název v původním jazyce

Blending in a spherical tank

Popis výsledku v původním jazyce

Performance of agitator, jet and pneumatic blending was evaluated on a spherical vessel. Spherical vessels can be found throughout the process industry, most commonly as storage tanks. However, there is a lack of fundamental data about mixing in this geometry. Acid-base indicator experiments were used to explore the blending process provided by various agitators, jet nozzle positions, and a pneumatic system. The performance of the various methods was assessed based on their energy consumption and blending time. Generally, the best performance was achieved with systems, which did not induce dominant tangential flow. From the tested methods, jet blending had the lowest energy consumption, while radial pumping agitators were the swiftest.

Název v anglickém jazyce

Blending in a spherical tank

Popis výsledku anglicky

Performance of agitator, jet and pneumatic blending was evaluated on a spherical vessel. Spherical vessels can be found throughout the process industry, most commonly as storage tanks. However, there is a lack of fundamental data about mixing in this geometry. Acid-base indicator experiments were used to explore the blending process provided by various agitators, jet nozzle positions, and a pneumatic system. The performance of the various methods was assessed based on their energy consumption and blending time. Generally, the best performance was achieved with systems, which did not induce dominant tangential flow. From the tested methods, jet blending had the lowest energy consumption, while radial pumping agitators were the swiftest.

Druh

J_imp - Článek v periodiku v databázi Web of Science

CEP obor

—

OECD FORD obor

20301 - Mechanical engineering

Projekt

—

Návaznosti

S - Specificky vyzkum na vysokych skolach

Rok uplatnění

2023

Kód důvěrnosti údajů

S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů

Název periodika

Chemical Engineering Research and Design

ISSN

0263-8762

e-ISSN

1744-3563

Svazek periodika

190

Číslo periodika v rámci svazku

February

Stát vydavatele periodika

GB - Spojené království Velké Británie a Severního Irska

Počet stran výsledku

8

Strana od-do

489-496

Kód UT WoS článku

000974564200001

EID výsledku v databázi Scopus

2-s2.0-85146060217