Atrial Electrogram Complex Fractionated Entropy Study
Identifikátory výsledku
Kód výsledku v IS VaVaI
<a href="https://www.isvavai.cz/riv?ss=detail&h=RIV%2F68407700%3A21230%2F14%3A00221647" target="_blank" >RIV/68407700:21230/14:00221647 - isvavai.cz</a>
Nalezeny alternativní kódy
RIV/68407700:21730/14:00221647
Výsledek na webu
<a href="http://cardiologyacademicpress.com/soap/pdf/delme_2271_544424f0b723d8.09199528.pdf" target="_blank" >http://cardiologyacademicpress.com/soap/pdf/delme_2271_544424f0b723d8.09199528.pdf</a>
DOI - Digital Object Identifier
—
Alternativní jazyky
Jazyk výsledku
angličtina
Název v původním jazyce
Atrial Electrogram Complex Fractionated Entropy Study
Popis výsledku v původním jazyce
Atrial electrogram (AEGM) signal processing started to play an important role during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). This work uses Sample Entropy (SampEn) as a tool for quantification and evaluation of AEGM complexity and discrimination between complex fractionated AEGM (CFAE) and non CFAE. Additionally, SampEn classification capabilities and its robustness are tested against the presence of spikes and sample loss. Both signal disturbances were superimposed to the original AEGM signals. AEGM signals were measured during RFA of AF in patients recommended for RFA of AF. The database consisted of 113 AEGM signals of short length, 1.5 s, classified by experts into nonCFAE and CFAE classes. The results demonstrated that SampEn conserved its clinical validity up to a 10% of spike contamination (Cxy > 0.8) even though it was able to differentiate between CFAE and nonCFAE classes up to a spike probability of 0.5. It also proved to differentiate between nonCFAE and C
Název v anglickém jazyce
Atrial Electrogram Complex Fractionated Entropy Study
Popis výsledku anglicky
Atrial electrogram (AEGM) signal processing started to play an important role during radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of atrial fibrillation (AF). This work uses Sample Entropy (SampEn) as a tool for quantification and evaluation of AEGM complexity and discrimination between complex fractionated AEGM (CFAE) and non CFAE. Additionally, SampEn classification capabilities and its robustness are tested against the presence of spikes and sample loss. Both signal disturbances were superimposed to the original AEGM signals. AEGM signals were measured during RFA of AF in patients recommended for RFA of AF. The database consisted of 113 AEGM signals of short length, 1.5 s, classified by experts into nonCFAE and CFAE classes. The results demonstrated that SampEn conserved its clinical validity up to a 10% of spike contamination (Cxy > 0.8) even though it was able to differentiate between CFAE and nonCFAE classes up to a spike probability of 0.5. It also proved to differentiate between nonCFAE and C
Klasifikace
Druh
J<sub>x</sub> - Nezařazeno - Článek v odborném periodiku (Jimp, Jsc a Jost)
CEP obor
JC - Počítačový hardware a software
OECD FORD obor
—
Návaznosti výsledku
Projekt
<a href="/cs/project/GPP103%2F11%2FP106" target="_blank" >GPP103/11/P106: Integrace digitálního zpracování obrazu a metod umělé inteligence pro hodnocení komplexity intrakardiálních signálů</a><br>
Návaznosti
Z - Vyzkumny zamer (s odkazem do CEZ)
Ostatní
Rok uplatnění
2014
Kód důvěrnosti údajů
S - Úplné a pravdivé údaje o projektu nepodléhají ochraně podle zvláštních právních předpisů
Údaje specifické pro druh výsledku
Název periodika
Experimental & Clinical Cardiology
ISSN
1205-6626
e-ISSN
—
Svazek periodika
20
Číslo periodika v rámci svazku
9
Stát vydavatele periodika
CA - Kanada
Počet stran výsledku
9
Strana od-do
5566-5574
Kód UT WoS článku
—
EID výsledku v databázi Scopus
—